Well let me just say that I am an amateur musicologist
(very amateur so says my wife Linda). I love most all types of music (yes Vern,
even Country, Rap and Hip Hop sans songs with curse words and Misanthropic
content.)
So with that in mind please feel free to listen to these two beautiful
songs on YouTube before you start reading my fairly optimistic 2012 real estate
projections for Central Virginia. Of course I can hear you saying, “Heck (or worse) Rick, anything must be better than the 20%+- drop
we have seen in housing prices here in the Richmond area over the past 5 years.
I would say that is a fair comment but who truly believed that the Titanic would
sink? It can always get worse. But I am happy to prognosticate that I believe
that the Real Estate Market in Central Virginia will actually float and not sink
any further by the end of 2012.
Directly below are my comments regarding the 2011 and the 2012 Real Estate
Markets and below that is the actual full Clear Capital Housing Market Report.
Feel free to peruse it and formulate your own opinions.
I will now show the highlights of the report and give you my opinions about
those highlights. I guess I am entitled to do so since it is my Blog after
all:)
OK!!
Nationally overall housing prices fell 2.1% which was a result of a 2nd
half steadiness in prices and a decreasing number of Foreclosures on the
market.
Clear Capital forecasts that home prices on a national basis will show a
.2% increase at the end of the year. Don’t get too excited
as there is a decimal (.) before that 2
Nationally housing prices at the end of 2011 were at or about 2001 prices.
WHEW!! Thank goodness we are out of that
decade!!!
Clear Capital had the Richmond Metro Real Estate Market ranked 38 out of
the top 50 major Real Estate Markets. Richmond is projected to rank 38 out of
50 again for 2012. At least we are consistent. (Here is where I have a slightly different take).
Central Virginia’s housing prices dropped on average 5.9% year over year
from 2010 to 2011. The Great News going forward is that the 4th Quarter of 2011
vs the 4th Quarter of 2010 only showed a decrease of .9%. This shows a fairly significant stabilizing of housing prices in
our area in the 4th quarter of 2011 going forward into 2012. Additionally, the
Richmond Metro area had a Foreclosure (REO) saturation rate of 18.3% in 2011.
That means that 18.3% of all home sales in the Richmond Metro area were
foreclosures. While this number is historically high for Central Virginia it
is much lower than the national average rate of foreclosure sales to total sales
of 24.8%. This is significant since foreclosure sales are a huge reason for the
decrease in housing prices. Distressed properties typically sell at a discount
bringing down the non-foreclosure pricing. If we see a lessening of foreclosure
homes on the market the natural supply and demand of homes will start to
reappear.
The Big News coming out of Washington DC this
week is that there is a government (PLEASE DON’T CRINGE) plan which would allow
investors to make large bulk purchases of foreclosures homes (50, 100, 250 homes
at a time in one sale). This would clear many foreclosure homes from the
selling side of the supply and demand curve as it would decrease the overall supply of
homes. Investor purchasers would have to keep these large lot purchased homes
as rentals for a given time period. The net effect of this
would be a clearing of distressed properties from the housing market. Investors
would sustain most of the risk on these purchases and would have to rehab them
before renting them if need be. Families whose credit was ruined due to losing
a home would now have additional rental options.
Clear Capital predicts that Richmond will show a loss of 3.8% in home
prices in 2012 vs a loss of 5.9% in 2011. In a static world that may very well
be a great guess. In the past 3 years I was even more pessimistic because I
knew the underlying effect of falling home prices was due to the loss of several
major corporations and many other smaller firms in Central Virginia. However,
my boots on the ground investigation, thorough reading of the daily Richmond
Times Dispatch business page (plug for the RTD: Free Subscription anybody?)
and listening to my golden voiced buddy Jay Hart at WRVA
shows that many firms are now hiring and that there are many new firms coming to our
area. ie Amazon. Also, many firms are hiring but not making big announcements.
“What’s in Your Wallet?”.
drumroll please……..Here are my 2012 predictions for
housing prices in Central Virginia. I will do so by quarter.
The 1st Quarter will see a slight lowering of prices due to
seasonality. What I mean is that January through March is typically the 2nd
slowest quarter for homes sale in our area due to the cooler weather and the
fact that families’ with school age children do not want to move during the
middle of a school year. I predict a drop of 1% to 1 1/2% in home prices
during the 1st Quarter. This will be the best time
for a buyer to buy a home and ESPECIALLY for an Investor to buy a home due to
the fact that the 2nd slowest period of sales is the 1st quarter of a year and
the slowest quarter of sales is the last quarter of a year. After 6 months of
slow sales Sellers are typically more willing to make concessions. JANUARY,
FEBRUARY and MARCH will get the Buyer the best prices on homes. Sellers will
have to be price flexible to make a sale in this quarter.
(SHAMELESS PLUG FOR MYSELF:
CALL OR TEXT ME NOW AT
804-218-3143 TO BUY OR LIST A HOME THIS YEAR)
2nd Quarter sales will be the strongest of the year. The Sunshine Effect or Daylight Savings Time Effect or SPRING FEVER whatever you want to call it comes into play. Folks are tired of hunkering down in their homes for the winter and Thoughts of Sugarplums run through their minds. oops wrong quarter. But thoughts of New Places to live definitely run through their heads. With perhaps the end of the ridiculously low mortgage rates coming to be, buyers will get off the fence and lock in on the low rates with 30 year cheap money mortgages. Prices will firm as there will finally be an increase in demand and I look for an increase in prices in Central Virginia of 1 1/2% to 2% during this second quarter. This will be the Best Time for Sellers to get their homes sold. Just to be clear, this pricing power for sellers does
NOT mean every house will be sold and that you will get Cadillac prices.
Sellers will still have to have updated homes with some obvious upgrades to get
their homes sold. If you have an outdated home or are situated on an
undesirable lot then you will have to sell at a discount. But overall this will
be a good quarter in terms of housing prices for Central Virginia.
3rd Quarter sales are typically the 2nd best quarter in Central Virginia.
That will remain so in 2012. Fence Sitters among others will finally start
buying homes and will be more motivated to do so for fear of rising interest
rates and finally rising home prices. Nobody can consistently time any market
and the fear factor of missing this rising market’s bottom will spur sales.
How many Dot.com investors are among my blog readers? dos
users? candle users? chastity belt users? vinyl 45 users? tulip bulb
hoarders? I think you get the point. We better get on the train for fear of
missing it and having to walk to Hoboken will be the mindset. Would you
want to have to walk to Hoboken? Like I said, Don’t miss that train!!
Look for an increase in home prices of around 1% in the 3rd quarter of 2012.
The 4th quarter is typically the slowest (or 4th best quarter if you are an
optimist) quarter for homes sales in Central Virginia. This is the quarter
where thoughts of Sugarplums run through our heads. Families with children are
typically settled in and don’t want to make a move outside of their current
school district. Most folks are hunkered down as we head into the Holiday
Season and the beginning of winter. This is typically another good time to be a
buyer or an investor buyer as there are less overall buyers in the market. (I
swear this is true) some sellers truly get caught up in the spirit of the
season/or give in to frustration and are willing to make a deal to start the new
year fresh. The first and last quarters of a year are where my investor clients
get their best prices especially on foreclosure sales. Bank/Fannie/Freddie
asset managers want to end the year with less inventory and want to start the
year with good sales numbers when the demand is at its lowest. My prediction is
for a negative 1% to even rate of home prices for the final quarter of 2012 in
the Central Virginia Market area.
Here is my worst case scenario for home prices in Central Virginia for
2012. Flat prices at 0% increase from 2011. My best case scenario for 2012 is
for an increase of 2%. Not Great but trending in the right direction. Also
much better than the prediction by Clear Capital of a decrease of 3.8%.
Please do me a favor:) Remind me how right or
how wrong I am as we travel through this year. I will publish Clear Capital’s
economic data on a regular basis so I can’t
hide from my projections. Trust me if I am correct on my projections I will
remind you ad nauseam. I may happen to have amnesia if my projections are
wrong. Speaking of that: Does anybody know the way to San
Jose? WOW, San Jose is projected by Clear Capital to be the 16th best real
estate market in 2012. I better get those directions if I am wrong.
Market Report
Clear Capital®: U.S. Home Prices Down in 2011, but Market Stability Forecasted
for 2012
While year-over-year prices notched down in 2011, prices are
expected to see slight uptick in 2012, the first time in positive territory
since 2006.
TRUCKEE, Calif. – Jan. 9, 2012 – Clear Capital (www.clearcapital.com),
released its monthly Home Data Index™ (HDI) Market Report, with news of a
year-over-year national price change in 2011 of -2.1%, and forecast of a slight
0.2% gain in 2012.
Report highlights include:
-
2011′s decrease of
-2.1% year-over-year was bolstered by a stabilizing of prices in the latter
half of the year and decreasing REO saturation.
-
In 2012, U.S. home
prices are forecasted to show continued stabilization with a slight gain of
0.2% across all markets, remaining near levels not seen since back in 2001.
-
Importance of
micro-market analysis is reiterated as the 2012 forecast is for a flat U.S.
market, but only 40% of individual markets (20 of 50) are projected to be
stable.
“Overall, 2011 was a relatively quiet year for
U.S. home prices compared to the last five years,” said Dr. Alex Villacorta,
Director of Research and Analytics at Clear Capital. “With national prices down
a little more than two percent for the year and sitting at their lowest point
since 2001, our projections show that the current balance the market has found
will continue through 2012.”
“However, individual markets reacting to their
local economic drivers exhibit a wide range of performance levels,” added Dr.
Villacorta.“Although the national numbers suggest markets are flat, when
looking at individual metro markets it turns out only 24% of them showed signs
of stabilization in 2011, while the others are still moving more dramatically
higher or lower. What’s most interesting is that the lower segments of
appreciating markets are driving much of the current price growth. In places
like Florida, which have historically been hard hit, we are now seeing
considerable activity in lower-end properties as demand continues to heat up.”
2011: Quarter-over-Quarter Numbers Reflect Seasonality
U.S. prices declined -0.4% in December on a
quarter-over-quarter basis, showing the markets giving back some of the gains
of the summer buying season. This is the first cooling off after six monthly
reports showing minimal quarterly gains. In fact, the most recent six months of
the year (June – December) saw national home prices flat at -0.1%.
While these national quarterly numbers for
December fell slightly, half of the major markets covered saw quarterly gains.
Dayton, OH checked in at the top of highest quarterly performers with a gain of
5.0%. On the downside, Atlanta, GA showed consistent weakness as December’s
lowest performing major market with a loss of -8.4% quarter-over-quarter.
In addition to the relatively flat home price
performance, national REO saturation rates at the end of 2011 reached a new
yearly low at 24.8%. REO saturation was volatile early in 2011, and showed
consistent declines and stability toward the latter half of the year.
Top
2011: U.S. Numbers Stable Over the Year
The -2.1% price decline in 2011 marked the
smallest year-end change in either direction since the market gained 1.7% in
2006. The majority of the downturn was early in the year through May, with
upticks hitting during the summer buying season, and then remaining stable
through the fall and early winter.
Regional trends revealed a bit more price
variability. The Northeast’s meager 0.1% yearly gain led the nation, comparing
favorably to the -1.3%, -3.0% and -4.4% price declines turned in by the South,
Midwest and West, respectively.
While the changes in prices across the U.S.
were mild for 2011, there were notable extremes at the positive and negative
sides of the market. Four metros posted price declines greater than 10%, with
Atlanta leading the way down with a -18.3% price change, followed by Seattle,
WA at -15.1%. Birmingham, AL and Detroit, MI also rode the markets down with
-11.1% and -10.8% price drops, respectively. Each of the markets with double
digit declines saw an increase in the percentage of sales that were REOs
through the year.
On the positive side, Dayton enjoyed 11.5%
annual price growth in 2011. The next two strongest performers came from
Florida, with Orlando and Miami basking in 6.7% and 5.6% price gains,
respectively. Just as increasing REO saturation affected our worst performers,
decreasing REO saturation for these three markets in 2011 (Dayton down 12.3%,
Orlando down 21.0% and Miami down 9.9%) appeared to buoy their home prices for
the year. Chart 1 below shows all metro markets ranked by their yearly numbers,
and includes quarterly performance and REO saturation measured at the end of the
year.
Chart 1: 2011 Observed
|
Major U.S. Metro Markets (2011 Observed)
|
|
Qtr/Qtr
Rank
|
|
Metropolitan
Statistical Area |
|
2011 Observed Yr/Yr
|
|
2011 Observed Qtr/Qtr
|
|
REO Saturation
|
|
1
|
|
Dayton, OH |
|
11.5%
|
|
5.0%
|
|
29.2%
|
|
2
|
|
Orlando, FL |
|
6.7%
|
|
3.2%
|
|
24.9%
|
|
3
|
|
Miami, FL – Ft.
Lauderdale, FL – Miami Beach, FL |
|
5.6%
|
|
1.7%
|
|
31.3%
|
|
4
|
|
Rochester, NY |
|
4.7%
|
|
2.1%
|
|
3.5%
|
|
5
|
|
Milwaukee, WI –
Waukesha, WI – West Allis, WI |
|
4.5%
|
|
-0.3%
|
|
19.9%
|
|
6
|
|
Washington, DC –
Arlington, VA – Alexandria, VA |
|
3.5%
|
|
4.7%
|
|
11.8%
|
|
7
|
|
Denver, CO – Aurora,
CO |
|
3.3%
|
|
3.0%
|
|
22.5%
|
|
8
|
|
Dallas, TX – Fort
Worth, TX – Arlington, TX |
|
2.7%
|
|
0.7%
|
|
28.5%
|
|
9
|
|
Providence, RI –
NewBedford, MA – Fall River, MA |
|
2.6%
|
|
-3.4%
|
|
14.5%
|
|
10
|
|
Pittsburgh, PA |
|
2.5%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
6.1%
|
|
11
|
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
1.7%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
27.9%
|
|
12
|
|
Phoenix, AZ – Mesa, AZ
– Scottsdale, AZ |
|
1.5%
|
|
2.7%
|
|
32.9%
|
|
13
|
|
NY, NY – No. New
Jersey, NJ – Long Island, NY |
|
1.2%
|
|
0.6%
|
|
7.0%
|
|
14
|
|
Boston, MA –
Cambridge, MA – Quincy, MA |
|
0.1%
|
|
0.2%
|
|
8.7%
|
|
15
|
|
Tampa, FL – St.
Petersburg, FL – Clearwater, FL |
|
-0.6%
|
|
2.1%
|
|
23.7%
|
|
16
|
|
Houston, TX – Baytown,
TX – Sugar Land, TX |
|
-0.8%
|
|
1.8%
|
|
27.6%
|
|
17
|
|
Honolulu, HI |
|
-0.8%
|
|
1.6%
|
|
7.4%
|
|
18
|
|
Cleveland, OH –
Elyria, OH – Mentor, OH |
|
-1.1%
|
|
0.9%
|
|
31.1%
|
|
19
|
|
Oklahoma City, OK |
|
-1.2%
|
|
-1.6%
|
|
12.3%
|
|
20
|
|
Charlotte, NC –
Gastonia,NC – Concord, NC |
|
-2.2%
|
|
-0.3%
|
|
13.3%
|
|
21
|
|
San Jose, CA –
Sunnyvale, CA – Santa Clara, CA |
|
-2.5%
|
|
-0.1%
|
|
16.3%
|
|
22
|
|
Bakersfield, CA |
|
-2.6%
|
|
0.5%
|
|
42.7%
|
|
23
|
|
Chicago, IL –
Naperville, IL – Joliet, IL |
|
-2.6%
|
|
0.6%
|
|
29.9%
|
|
24
|
|
New Orleans, LA –
Metairie, LA – Kenner, LA |
|
-2.9%
|
|
-1.9%
|
|
20.6%
|
|
25
|
|
Riverside, CA – San
Bernardino, CA – Ontario, CA |
|
-3.4%
|
|
-1.7%
|
|
42.2%
|
|
26
|
|
Columbus, OH |
|
-3.5%
|
|
0.3%
|
|
33.9%
|
|
27
|
|
Portland, OR –
Vancouver, OR – Beaverton, OR |
|
-3.5%
|
|
0.8%
|
|
15.5%
|
|
28
|
|
Hartford, CT – West
Hartford, CT – East Hartford, CT |
|
-3.6%
|
|
0.4%
|
|
5.4%
|
|
29
|
|
Raleigh, NC – Cary, NC |
|
-3.7%
|
|
-0.9%
|
|
5.6%
|
|
30
|
|
Los Angeles, CA – Long
Beach, CA – Santa Ana, CA |
|
-3.7%
|
|
-2.3%
|
|
28.9%
|
|
31
|
|
Cincinnati, OH –
Middletown, OH |
|
-4.1%
|
|
-0.4%
|
|
22.3%
|
|
32
|
|
Virginia Beach, VA –
Norfolk, VA – Newport News, VA |
|
-4.4%
|
|
1.2%
|
|
20.0%
|
|
33
|
|
Memphis, TN |
|
-4.7%
|
|
-6.4%
|
|
37.4%
|
|
34
|
|
San Diego, CA –
Carlsbad, CA – San Marcos, CA |
|
-4.7%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
24.3%
|
|
35
|
|
San Francisco, CA –
Oakland, CA – Fremont, CA |
|
-4.7%
|
|
5.0%
|
|
3.3%
|
|
36
|
|
Nashville, TN –
Davidson, TN – Murfreesboro, TN |
|
-4.8%
|
|
-0.8%
|
|
17.1%
|
|
37
|
|
Philadelphia, PA –
Camden, NJ – Wilmington, DE |
|
-5.0%
|
|
-2.5%
|
|
9.9%
|
|
38
|
|
Richmond, VA |
|
-5.9%
|
|
-0.9%
|
|
18.3%
|
|
39
|
|
Baltimore, MD –
Towson, MD |
|
-6.2%
|
|
-1.7%
|
|
14.2%
|
|
40
|
|
Sacramento, CA –
Arden, CA – Roseville, CA |
|
-6.9%
|
|
-0.1%
|
|
34.0%
|
|
41
|
|
Fresno, CA |
|
-7.3%
|
|
0.5%
|
|
38.6%
|
|
42
|
|
St. Louis, MO |
|
-7.7%
|
|
-0.9%
|
|
25.9%
|
|
43
|
|
Oxnard, CA – Thousand
Oaks, CA – Ventura, CA |
|
-7.8%
|
|
-3.7%
|
|
28.0%
|
|
44
|
|
Minneapolis, MN –
St.Paul, MN – Bloomington, WI |
|
-8.7%
|
|
-0.5%
|
|
42.1%
|
|
45
|
|
Las Vegas, NV – Paradise,
NV |
|
-9.2%
|
|
-2.0%
|
|
46.5%
|
|
46
|
|
Tucson, AZ |
|
-9.4%
|
|
-1.5%
|
|
39.2%
|
|
47
|
|
Detroit, MI – Warren,
MI – Livonia, MI |
|
-10.8%
|
|
-4.7%
|
|
48.4%
|
|
48
|
|
Birmingham, AL –
Hoover, AL |
|
-11.1%
|
|
4.3%
|
|
34.0%
|
|
49
|
|
Seattle, WA – Tacoma,
WA – Bellevue, WA |
|
-15.1%
|
|
-3.7%
|
|
19.7%
|
|
50
|
|
Atlanta, GA – Sandy
Springs, GA – Marietta, GA |
|
-18.3%
|
|
-8.4%
|
|
42.2%
|
Top
Looking To 2012: The End of Five Years of Declines?
-
U.S. price gains forecasted
at 0.2% for 2012.
-
Various metros
continue to be volatile, some double digit gains and losses are expected.
-
Florida markets
predicted to lead recovery as all four markets expect solid increases.
On the national level, 2012 is expected to
play out much like the last half of 2011, with a very subtle price change. A
minimal decline in the beginning of the year is expected to turn into a meager
gain by year’s end. At a more granular level, half of the 50 major metro
markets are expected to post gains for the year, and individual metros will
experience the full gamut of price movement, from double-digit growth to
double-digit drops.
Double digit volatility can be seen with the
two strongest markets, including Orlando with a healthy price increase of
11.7%, and Bakersfield close behind with a projected 11.1% increase. The
deepest drops come from Atlanta with an expected drop of -14.4%, and Los
Angeles with a predicted drop of -10.3%.
Chart 2 (below) shows the 2012 forecast with
each market ranked by year-over-year performance, and includes 2011
year-over-year performance and ranking of those markets for comparison.
Following Orlando’s lead, other Florida
markets are expected to extend their impressive 2011 performances into 2012.
Miami and Tampa are projected to be among the five highest performing metros
with 8.8% and 7.4% growth, respectively, and Jacksonville is forecasted to gain
4.3%, placing it at a respectable eighth among the top metro markets. The
exceptional growth in these markets can be a result of several factors,
including being hit especially hard in the downturn. While fighting back, they
remain significantly off their highs of 2006. Other factors in play in these
markets include large increases in the values of their lower priced homes (near
double-digits for all markets) when compared to higher priced segments of the
market, and a high percentage of all cash transactions (51.8%) when compared to
other metros. This indicates a high degree of investor activity as they look
for bargains in the region, driving up demand.
Chart 2: 2012 Forecast
|
50 Major U.S. Metro Markets Price Change (2012 Forecast)
|
|
Qtr/Qtr
Rank
|
|
Metropolitan
Statistical Area |
|
2012 Forecast Yr/Yr
|
|
2011 Observed Yr/Yr
|
|
2011 Observed Rank
|
|
1
|
|
Orlando, FL |
|
11.7%
|
|
6.7%
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
Bakersfield, CA |
|
11.1%
|
|
-2.6%
|
|
22
|
|
3
|
|
Washington, DC –
Arlington, VA – Alexandria, VA |
|
9.3%
|
|
3.5%
|
|
6
|
|
4
|
|
Phoenix, AZ – Mesa, AZ
– Scottsdale, AZ |
|
8.9%
|
|
1.5%
|
|
12
|
|
5
|
|
Miami, FL – Ft.
Lauderdale, FL – Miami Beach, FL |
|
8.8%
|
|
5.6%
|
|
3
|
|
6
|
|
Tampa, FL – St.
Petersburg, FL – Clearwater, FL |
|
7.4%
|
|
-0.6%
|
|
15
|
|
7
|
|
Dallas, TX – Fort
Worth, TX – Arlington, TX |
|
5.8%
|
|
2.7%
|
|
8
|
|
8
|
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
4.3%
|
|
1.7%
|
|
11
|
|
9
|
|
Cleveland, OH –
Elyria, OH – Mentor, OH |
|
4.2%
|
|
-1.1%
|
|
18
|
|
10
|
|
Honolulu, HI |
|
3.2%
|
|
-0.8%
|
|
17
|
|
11
|
|
Houston, TX – Baytown,
TX – Sugar Land, TX |
|
3.0%
|
|
-0.8%
|
|
16
|
|
12
|
|
New York, NY – No. New
Jersey, NJ – Long Island, NY |
|
3.0%
|
|
1.2%
|
|
13
|
|
13
|
|
Memphis, TN |
|
2.5%
|
|
-4.7%
|
|
33
|
|
14
|
|
Portland, OR –
Vancouver, OR – Beaverton, OR |
|
1.9%
|
|
-3.5%
|
|
27
|
|
15
|
|
Denver, CO – Aurora,
CO |
|
1.8%
|
|
3.3%
|
|
7
|
|
16
|
|
San Jose, CA –
Sunnyvale, CA – Santa Clara, CA |
|
1.6%
|
|
-2.5%
|
|
21
|
|
17
|
|
New Orleans, LA –
Metairie, LA – Kenner, LA |
|
1.6%
|
|
-2.9%
|
|
24
|
|
18
|
|
Fresno, CA |
|
1.5%
|
|
-7.3%
|
|
41
|
|
19
|
|
Boston, MA –
Cambridge, MA – Quincy, MA |
|
1.4%
|
|
0.1%
|
|
14
|
|
20
|
|
Dayton, OH |
|
1.4%
|
|
11.5%
|
|
1
|
|
21
|
|
Oklahoma City, OK |
|
1.1%
|
|
-1.2%
|
|
19
|
|
22
|
|
Providence, RI –
NewBedford, MA – Fall River, MA |
|
1.0%
|
|
2.6%
|
|
9
|
|
23
|
|
Pittsburgh, PA |
|
0.4%
|
|
2.5%
|
|
10
|
|
24
|
|
San Francisco, CA –
Oakland, CA – Fremont, CA |
|
0.1%
|
|
-4.7%
|
|
35
|
|
25
|
|
Milwaukee, WI –
Waukesha, WI – West Allis, WI |
|
0.1%
|
|
4.5%
|
|
5
|
|
26
|
|
Rochester, NY |
|
-0.2%
|
|
4.7%
|
|
4
|
|
27
|
|
Charlotte, NC –
Gastonia,NC – Concord, NC |
|
-1.5%
|
|
-2.2%
|
|
20
|
|
28
|
|
Columbus, OH |
|
-2.0%
|
|
-3.5%
|
|
26
|
|
29
|
|
Cincinnati, OH –
Middletown, OH |
|
-2.2%
|
|
-4.1%
|
|
31
|
|
30
|
|
Virginia Beach, VA –
Norfolk, VA – Newport News, VA |
|
-2.3%
|
|
-4.4%
|
|
32
|
|
31
|
|
Minneapolis, MN –
St.Paul, MN – Bloomington, WI |
|
-2.4%
|
|
-8.7%
|
|
44
|
|
32
|
|
Hartford, CT – West
Hartford, CT – East Hartford, CT |
|
-2.4%
|
|
-3.6%
|
|
28
|
|
33
|
|
Raleigh, NC – Cary, NC |
|
-3.0%
|
|
-3.7%
|
|
29
|
|
34
|
|
Sacramento, CA – Arden,
CA – Roseville, CA |
|
-3.3%
|
|
-6.9%
|
|
40
|
|
35
|
|
Tucson, AZ |
|
-3.6%
|
|
-9.4%
|
|
46
|
|
36
|
|
Birmingham, AL –
Hoover, AL |
|
-3.8%
|
|
-11.1%
|
|
48
|
|
37
|
|
Nashville, TN –
Davidson, TN – Murfreesboro, TN |
|
-3.8%
|
|
-4.8%
|
|
36
|
|
38
|
|
Richmond, VA |
|
-3.8%
|
|
-5.9%
|
|
38
|
|
39
|
|
San Diego, CA – Carlsbad,
CA – San Marcos, CA |
|
-3.8%
|
|
-4.7%
|
|
34
|
|
40
|
|
St. Louis, MO |
|
-3.9%
|
|
-7.7%
|
|
42
|
|
41
|
|
Philadelphia, PA –
Camden, NJ – Wilmington, DE |
|
-4.1%
|
|
-5.0%
|
|
37
|
|
42
|
|
Riverside, CA – San
Bernardino, CA – Ontario, CA |
|
-4.2%
|
|
-3.4%
|
|
25
|
|
43
|
|
Baltimore, MD –
Towson, MD |
|
-4.9%
|
|
-6.2%
|
|
39
|
|
44
|
|
Chicago, IL –
Naperville, IL – Joliet, IL |
|
-5.2%
|
|
-2.6%
|
|
23
|
|
45
|
|
Detroit, MI – Warren,
MI – Livonia, MI |
|
-5.6%
|
|
-10.8%
|
|
47
|
|
46
|
|
Las Vegas, NV –
Paradise, NV |
|
-6.4%
|
|
-9.2%
|
|
45
|
|
47
|
|
Oxnard, CA – Thousand
Oaks, CA – Ventura, CA |
|
-6.7%
|
|
-7.8%
|
|
43
|
|
48
|
|
Seattle, WA – Tacoma,
WA – Bellevue, WA |
|
-7.5%
|
|
-15.1%
|
|
49
|
|
49
|
|
Los Angeles, CA – Long
Beach, CA – Santa Ana, CA |
|
-10.3%
|
|
-3.7%
|
|
30
|
|
50
|
|
Atlanta, GA – Sandy
Springs, GA – Marietta, GA |
|
-14.4%
|
|
-18.3%
|
|
50
|
Top
2012: The Forecast in Perspective
Although the range of movement for U.S. prices
stabilized through 2011, prices have settled at the lowest level since early
2001 (see Chart 3 below). The forecast for 2012 shows home prices starting with
a dip in the first quarter, improving in the spring and summer buying season,
and continuing to climb to 0.2% overall growth for 2012.
Chart 3: Relative Index Value (2000 – 2011 Observed and 2012 Forecast)
For 2012: Buyer Beware
Although “stable” and “flat”
have been used to describe the performance of 2011 and forecast for 2012, the
performance of individual metro markets has not been flat at all. In fact,
metros across the nation have experienced an interesting balance of increases
and losses, that when averaged, create an impression that metro markets across
the U.S. are stable.
Individual markets reacting to their local
economic conditions continued to exhibit a wide range of performance levels in
2011, with only 12 of the top 50 metro markets (24%), returning year-over-year
price movement that can be considered stable – price swings of less than 2.5
percentage points. This will continue into 2012, with only 40% being considered
stable.
Chart 4 (below) indicates the forecasted
movement of 50 metros within our 2012 forecast. It includes the forecasted 0.2%
increase as the black horizontal line, and the metro markets that are within
+/- 2.5% of zero change in red to represent price stability. The chart shows 20
of 50 markets shown to be stable, with the rest being above 2.5% increases or
below -2.5% declines.
Chart 4: Distribution of 2012 Forecast Yearly Price Changes (Top
50 Markets)
This large expected fluctuation in home prices
among the individual markets speaks to the importance of regularly tracking
each market’s performance as numerous dynamics, including varying REO
saturation and unemployment levels, are still very much in play.
Success in 2012′s real estate market will be
driven by picking markets carefully and fully understanding local drivers.
Top
About the Clear Capital Home Data Index (HDI) Market Report
The Clear Capital HDI Market Report provides
insights into market trends and other leading indices for the real estate
market at the national and local levels. A critical difference in the value of
the HDI Market Report is the capability of Clear Capital to provide more timely
and granular reporting than other home price index providers.
The Clear Capital HDI Market Report:
-
Offers the real estate
industry (investors, lenders and servicers), government agencies and the public
insight into the most recent pricing conditions, not only at the national and
metropolitan level, but within local markets as well.
-
Is built on the most
recent information available from recorder/assessor offices, and then further
enhanced by adding the company’s proprietary streaming market data for the most
comprehensive geographic coverage and local insights available.
-
Reflects nationwide
coverage of sales transactions and aggregates this comprehensive dataset at ten
different geographic levels, including hundreds of metropolitan statistical
areas (MSAs) and sub-ZIP code boundaries.
-
Includes
equally-weighted distressed bank owned sales (REOs) from around the country to
give the most real world look of pricing dynamics across all sales types.
-
Allows for the most
current market data by providing more frequent updates with patent-pending
rolling quarter technology. This ensures decisions are based on the most
up-to-date information available.
Clear Capital Home Data Index™ Methodology
-
Generates the timeliest
indices in patent pending rolling quarter intervals that compare the most
recent four months to the previous three months. The rolling quarters have no
fixed start date and can be used to generate indices as data flows in,
significantly reducing the multi-month lag time experienced with other indices.
-
Includes both fair
market and institutional (real estate owned) transactions, giving equal weight
to all market transactions and identifying price tiers at a market specific
level. By giving equal weight to all transactions the HDI is truly
representative of each unique market.
-
Results from an
address-level cascade create an index with the most granular, statistically
significant market area available.
-
Provides classes of
weighted repeat sale and price-per-square-foot indices that use multiple sale
types, including single-family homes, multi-family homes and condominiums.
About Clear Capital
Clear Capital (www.clearcapital.com) is a
premium provider of data and solutions for real estate asset valuation and risk
assessment for large financial services companies. Our products include
appraisals, broker-price opinions, property condition inspections, value
reconciliations, and home data indices. Clear Capital’s combination of
progressive technology, high caliber in-house staff and a well-trained network
of more than 40,000 field experts sets a new standard for accurate, up-to-date
and well documented valuation data and assessments. The Company’s customers
include the largest U.S. banks, investment firms and other financial
organizations.
Legend
Home Data Index (HDI) – Powerful analytics
tool that provides contextual data augmenting other, human-based valuation
tools. Clear Capital’s multi-model approach combines address-level accuracy
with the most current proprietary home pricing data available.
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) – Geographic entities defined by the U.S.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies
in collecting, tabulating, and publishing Federal statistics.
Real Estate Owned (REO) Saturation – Calculates the percentage of REOs sold as
compared to all properties sold in the last rolling quarter.
Rolling Quarters – Clear Capital uses patent pending rolling
quarter intervals to compare the most recent three months and a fourth month of
proprietary data against the previous three months. We include the most current
fourth month of proprietary pricing data, because it often contains the most
relevant and insightful information.
The information contained in this report is
based on sources that are deemed to be reliable; however no representation or
warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any
particular purpose of any information contained herein. This report is not
intended as investment advice, and should not be viewed as any guarantee of
value, condition, or other attribute.
Media Contact:
Michelle Sabolich
Atomic PR for Clear Capital
(415) 593-1400
michelle.sabolich@atomicpr.com
Tags: Central Virginia Real Estate, Funny commentary, Housing Statistics, Investment Properties, Real Estate Market Analysis, Richmond Virginia Real Estate, Virginia Real Estate
Final 2011 and Projected 2012 Real Estate Data from the Clear Capital Economic Report! Where do we go from Here??
Jan 10
Posted by rickstockel in All Rick Stockel Real Estate Posts, Real Estate Data and Analysis, Real Estate Market Opinions of Rick Stockel | No Comments
(very amateur so says my wife Linda). I love most all types of music (yes Vern,
even Country, Rap and Hip Hop sans songs with curse words and Misanthropic
content.)
songs on YouTube before you start reading my fairly optimistic 2012 real estate
projections for Central Virginia. Of course I can hear you saying, “Heck (or worse) Rick, anything must be better than the 20%+- drop
we have seen in housing prices here in the Richmond area over the past 5 years.
I would say that is a fair comment but who truly believed that the Titanic would
sink? It can always get worse. But I am happy to prognosticate that I believe
that the Real Estate Market in Central Virginia will actually float and not sink
any further by the end of 2012.
Chicago: Where do we go from here?
Alicia Keys: Where do we go from here?
Markets and below that is the actual full Clear Capital Housing Market Report.
Feel free to peruse it and formulate your own opinions.
those highlights. I guess I am entitled to do so since it is my Blog after
all:)
half steadiness in prices and a decreasing number of Foreclosures on the
market.
.2% increase at the end of the year. Don’t get too excited
as there is a decimal (.) before that 2
WHEW!! Thank goodness we are out of that
decade!!!
the top 50 major Real Estate Markets. Richmond is projected to rank 38 out of
50 again for 2012. At least we are consistent. (Here is where I have a slightly different take).
from 2010 to 2011. The Great News going forward is that the 4th Quarter of 2011
vs the 4th Quarter of 2010 only showed a decrease of .9%. This shows a fairly significant stabilizing of housing prices in
our area in the 4th quarter of 2011 going forward into 2012. Additionally, the
Richmond Metro area had a Foreclosure (REO) saturation rate of 18.3% in 2011.
That means that 18.3% of all home sales in the Richmond Metro area were
foreclosures. While this number is historically high for Central Virginia it
is much lower than the national average rate of foreclosure sales to total sales
of 24.8%. This is significant since foreclosure sales are a huge reason for the
decrease in housing prices. Distressed properties typically sell at a discount
bringing down the non-foreclosure pricing. If we see a lessening of foreclosure
homes on the market the natural supply and demand of homes will start to
reappear.
week is that there is a government (PLEASE DON’T CRINGE) plan which would allow
investors to make large bulk purchases of foreclosures homes (50, 100, 250 homes
at a time in one sale). This would clear many foreclosure homes from the
selling side of the supply and demand curve as it would decrease the overall supply of
homes. Investor purchasers would have to keep these large lot purchased homes
as rentals for a given time period. The net effect of this
would be a clearing of distressed properties from the housing market. Investors
would sustain most of the risk on these purchases and would have to rehab them
before renting them if need be. Families whose credit was ruined due to losing
a home would now have additional rental options.
prices in 2012 vs a loss of 5.9% in 2011. In a static world that may very well
be a great guess. In the past 3 years I was even more pessimistic because I
knew the underlying effect of falling home prices was due to the loss of several
major corporations and many other smaller firms in Central Virginia. However,
my boots on the ground investigation, thorough reading of the daily Richmond
Times Dispatch business page (plug for the RTD: Free Subscription anybody?)
shows that many firms are now hiring and that there are many new firms coming to our
area. ie Amazon. Also, many firms are hiring but not making big announcements.
“What’s in Your Wallet?”.
housing prices in Central Virginia. I will do so by quarter.
seasonality. What I mean is that January through March is typically the 2nd
slowest quarter for homes sale in our area due to the cooler weather and the
fact that families’ with school age children do not want to move during the
middle of a school year. I predict a drop of 1% to 1 1/2% in home prices
during the 1st Quarter. This will be the best time
for a buyer to buy a home and ESPECIALLY for an Investor to buy a home due to
the fact that the 2nd slowest period of sales is the 1st quarter of a year and
the slowest quarter of sales is the last quarter of a year. After 6 months of
slow sales Sellers are typically more willing to make concessions. JANUARY,
FEBRUARY and MARCH will get the Buyer the best prices on homes. Sellers will
have to be price flexible to make a sale in this quarter.
804-218-3143 TO BUY OR LIST A HOME THIS YEAR)
NOT mean every house will be sold and that you will get Cadillac prices.
Sellers will still have to have updated homes with some obvious upgrades to get
their homes sold. If you have an outdated home or are situated on an
undesirable lot then you will have to sell at a discount. But overall this will
be a good quarter in terms of housing prices for Central Virginia.
That will remain so in 2012. Fence Sitters among others will finally start
buying homes and will be more motivated to do so for fear of rising interest
rates and finally rising home prices. Nobody can consistently time any market
and the fear factor of missing this rising market’s bottom will spur sales.
How many Dot.com investors are among my blog readers? dos
users? candle users? chastity belt users? vinyl 45 users? tulip bulb
hoarders? I think you get the point. We better get on the train for fear of
missing it and having to walk to Hoboken will be the mindset. Would you
want to have to walk to Hoboken? Like I said, Don’t miss that train!!
optimist) quarter for homes sales in Central Virginia. This is the quarter
where thoughts of Sugarplums run through our heads. Families with children are
typically settled in and don’t want to make a move outside of their current
school district. Most folks are hunkered down as we head into the Holiday
Season and the beginning of winter. This is typically another good time to be a
buyer or an investor buyer as there are less overall buyers in the market. (I
swear this is true) some sellers truly get caught up in the spirit of the
season/or give in to frustration and are willing to make a deal to start the new
year fresh. The first and last quarters of a year are where my investor clients
get their best prices especially on foreclosure sales. Bank/Fannie/Freddie
asset managers want to end the year with less inventory and want to start the
year with good sales numbers when the demand is at its lowest. My prediction is
for a negative 1% to even rate of home prices for the final quarter of 2012 in
the Central Virginia Market area.
2012. Flat prices at 0% increase from 2011. My best case scenario for 2012 is
for an increase of 2%. Not Great but trending in the right direction. Also
much better than the prediction by Clear Capital of a decrease of 3.8%.
how wrong I am as we travel through this year. I will publish Clear Capital’s
economic data on a regular basis so I can’t
hide from my projections. Trust me if I am correct on my projections I will
remind you ad nauseam. I may happen to have amnesia if my projections are
wrong. Speaking of that: Does anybody know the way to San
Jose? WOW, San Jose is projected by Clear Capital to be the 16th best real
estate market in 2012. I better get those directions if I am wrong.
Market Report
Clear Capital®: U.S. Home Prices Down in 2011, but Market Stability Forecasted
for 2012
While year-over-year prices notched down in 2011, prices are
expected to see slight uptick in 2012, the first time in positive territory
since 2006.
TRUCKEE, Calif. – Jan. 9, 2012 – Clear Capital (www.clearcapital.com),
released its monthly Home Data Index™ (HDI) Market Report, with news of a
year-over-year national price change in 2011 of -2.1%, and forecast of a slight
0.2% gain in 2012.
Report highlights include:
-2.1% year-over-year was bolstered by a stabilizing of prices in the latter
half of the year and decreasing REO saturation.
prices are forecasted to show continued stabilization with a slight gain of
0.2% across all markets, remaining near levels not seen since back in 2001.
micro-market analysis is reiterated as the 2012 forecast is for a flat U.S.
market, but only 40% of individual markets (20 of 50) are projected to be
stable.
“Overall, 2011 was a relatively quiet year for
U.S. home prices compared to the last five years,” said Dr. Alex Villacorta,
Director of Research and Analytics at Clear Capital. “With national prices down
a little more than two percent for the year and sitting at their lowest point
since 2001, our projections show that the current balance the market has found
will continue through 2012.”
“However, individual markets reacting to their
local economic drivers exhibit a wide range of performance levels,” added Dr.
Villacorta.“Although the national numbers suggest markets are flat, when
looking at individual metro markets it turns out only 24% of them showed signs
of stabilization in 2011, while the others are still moving more dramatically
higher or lower. What’s most interesting is that the lower segments of
appreciating markets are driving much of the current price growth. In places
like Florida, which have historically been hard hit, we are now seeing
considerable activity in lower-end properties as demand continues to heat up.”
2011: Quarter-over-Quarter Numbers Reflect Seasonality
U.S. prices declined -0.4% in December on a
quarter-over-quarter basis, showing the markets giving back some of the gains
of the summer buying season. This is the first cooling off after six monthly
reports showing minimal quarterly gains. In fact, the most recent six months of
the year (June – December) saw national home prices flat at -0.1%.
While these national quarterly numbers for
December fell slightly, half of the major markets covered saw quarterly gains.
Dayton, OH checked in at the top of highest quarterly performers with a gain of
5.0%. On the downside, Atlanta, GA showed consistent weakness as December’s
lowest performing major market with a loss of -8.4% quarter-over-quarter.
In addition to the relatively flat home price
performance, national REO saturation rates at the end of 2011 reached a new
yearly low at 24.8%. REO saturation was volatile early in 2011, and showed
consistent declines and stability toward the latter half of the year.
Top
2011: U.S. Numbers Stable Over the Year
The -2.1% price decline in 2011 marked the
smallest year-end change in either direction since the market gained 1.7% in
2006. The majority of the downturn was early in the year through May, with
upticks hitting during the summer buying season, and then remaining stable
through the fall and early winter.
Regional trends revealed a bit more price
variability. The Northeast’s meager 0.1% yearly gain led the nation, comparing
favorably to the -1.3%, -3.0% and -4.4% price declines turned in by the South,
Midwest and West, respectively.
While the changes in prices across the U.S.
were mild for 2011, there were notable extremes at the positive and negative
sides of the market. Four metros posted price declines greater than 10%, with
Atlanta leading the way down with a -18.3% price change, followed by Seattle,
WA at -15.1%. Birmingham, AL and Detroit, MI also rode the markets down with
-11.1% and -10.8% price drops, respectively. Each of the markets with double
digit declines saw an increase in the percentage of sales that were REOs
through the year.
On the positive side, Dayton enjoyed 11.5%
annual price growth in 2011. The next two strongest performers came from
Florida, with Orlando and Miami basking in 6.7% and 5.6% price gains,
respectively. Just as increasing REO saturation affected our worst performers,
decreasing REO saturation for these three markets in 2011 (Dayton down 12.3%,
Orlando down 21.0% and Miami down 9.9%) appeared to buoy their home prices for
the year. Chart 1 below shows all metro markets ranked by their yearly numbers,
and includes quarterly performance and REO saturation measured at the end of the
year.
Chart 1: 2011 Observed
Major U.S. Metro Markets (2011 Observed)
Qtr/Qtr
Rank
Statistical Area
2011 Observed Yr/Yr
2011 Observed Qtr/Qtr
REO Saturation
1
11.5%
5.0%
29.2%
2
6.7%
3.2%
24.9%
3
Lauderdale, FL – Miami Beach, FL
5.6%
1.7%
31.3%
4
4.7%
2.1%
3.5%
5
Waukesha, WI – West Allis, WI
4.5%
-0.3%
19.9%
6
Arlington, VA – Alexandria, VA
3.5%
4.7%
11.8%
7
CO
3.3%
3.0%
22.5%
8
Worth, TX – Arlington, TX
2.7%
0.7%
28.5%
9
NewBedford, MA – Fall River, MA
2.6%
-3.4%
14.5%
10
2.5%
0.0%
6.1%
11
1.7%
0.1%
27.9%
12
– Scottsdale, AZ
1.5%
2.7%
32.9%
13
Jersey, NJ – Long Island, NY
1.2%
0.6%
7.0%
14
Cambridge, MA – Quincy, MA
0.1%
0.2%
8.7%
15
Petersburg, FL – Clearwater, FL
-0.6%
2.1%
23.7%
16
TX – Sugar Land, TX
-0.8%
1.8%
27.6%
17
-0.8%
1.6%
7.4%
18
Elyria, OH – Mentor, OH
-1.1%
0.9%
31.1%
19
-1.2%
-1.6%
12.3%
20
Gastonia,NC – Concord, NC
-2.2%
-0.3%
13.3%
21
Sunnyvale, CA – Santa Clara, CA
-2.5%
-0.1%
16.3%
22
-2.6%
0.5%
42.7%
23
Naperville, IL – Joliet, IL
-2.6%
0.6%
29.9%
24
Metairie, LA – Kenner, LA
-2.9%
-1.9%
20.6%
25
Bernardino, CA – Ontario, CA
-3.4%
-1.7%
42.2%
26
-3.5%
0.3%
33.9%
27
Vancouver, OR – Beaverton, OR
-3.5%
0.8%
15.5%
28
Hartford, CT – East Hartford, CT
-3.6%
0.4%
5.4%
29
-3.7%
-0.9%
5.6%
30
Beach, CA – Santa Ana, CA
-3.7%
-2.3%
28.9%
31
Middletown, OH
-4.1%
-0.4%
22.3%
32
Norfolk, VA – Newport News, VA
-4.4%
1.2%
20.0%
33
-4.7%
-6.4%
37.4%
34
Carlsbad, CA – San Marcos, CA
-4.7%
0.1%
24.3%
35
Oakland, CA – Fremont, CA
-4.7%
5.0%
3.3%
36
Davidson, TN – Murfreesboro, TN
-4.8%
-0.8%
17.1%
37
Camden, NJ – Wilmington, DE
-5.0%
-2.5%
9.9%
38
-5.9%
-0.9%
18.3%
39
Towson, MD
-6.2%
-1.7%
14.2%
40
Arden, CA – Roseville, CA
-6.9%
-0.1%
34.0%
41
-7.3%
0.5%
38.6%
42
-7.7%
-0.9%
25.9%
43
Oaks, CA – Ventura, CA
-7.8%
-3.7%
28.0%
44
St.Paul, MN – Bloomington, WI
-8.7%
-0.5%
42.1%
45
NV
-9.2%
-2.0%
46.5%
46
-9.4%
-1.5%
39.2%
47
MI – Livonia, MI
-10.8%
-4.7%
48.4%
48
Hoover, AL
-11.1%
4.3%
34.0%
49
WA – Bellevue, WA
-15.1%
-3.7%
19.7%
50
Springs, GA – Marietta, GA
-18.3%
-8.4%
42.2%
Top
Looking To 2012: The End of Five Years of Declines?
at 0.2% for 2012.
continue to be volatile, some double digit gains and losses are expected.
predicted to lead recovery as all four markets expect solid increases.
On the national level, 2012 is expected to
play out much like the last half of 2011, with a very subtle price change. A
minimal decline in the beginning of the year is expected to turn into a meager
gain by year’s end. At a more granular level, half of the 50 major metro
markets are expected to post gains for the year, and individual metros will
experience the full gamut of price movement, from double-digit growth to
double-digit drops.
Double digit volatility can be seen with the
two strongest markets, including Orlando with a healthy price increase of
11.7%, and Bakersfield close behind with a projected 11.1% increase. The
deepest drops come from Atlanta with an expected drop of -14.4%, and Los
Angeles with a predicted drop of -10.3%.
Chart 2 (below) shows the 2012 forecast with
each market ranked by year-over-year performance, and includes 2011
year-over-year performance and ranking of those markets for comparison.
Following Orlando’s lead, other Florida
markets are expected to extend their impressive 2011 performances into 2012.
Miami and Tampa are projected to be among the five highest performing metros
with 8.8% and 7.4% growth, respectively, and Jacksonville is forecasted to gain
4.3%, placing it at a respectable eighth among the top metro markets. The
exceptional growth in these markets can be a result of several factors,
including being hit especially hard in the downturn. While fighting back, they
remain significantly off their highs of 2006. Other factors in play in these
markets include large increases in the values of their lower priced homes (near
double-digits for all markets) when compared to higher priced segments of the
market, and a high percentage of all cash transactions (51.8%) when compared to
other metros. This indicates a high degree of investor activity as they look
for bargains in the region, driving up demand.
Chart 2: 2012 Forecast
50 Major U.S. Metro Markets Price Change (2012 Forecast)
Qtr/Qtr
Rank
Statistical Area
2012 Forecast Yr/Yr
2011 Observed Yr/Yr
2011 Observed Rank
1
11.7%
6.7%
2
2
11.1%
-2.6%
22
3
Arlington, VA – Alexandria, VA
9.3%
3.5%
6
4
– Scottsdale, AZ
8.9%
1.5%
12
5
Lauderdale, FL – Miami Beach, FL
8.8%
5.6%
3
6
Petersburg, FL – Clearwater, FL
7.4%
-0.6%
15
7
Worth, TX – Arlington, TX
5.8%
2.7%
8
8
4.3%
1.7%
11
9
Elyria, OH – Mentor, OH
4.2%
-1.1%
18
10
3.2%
-0.8%
17
11
TX – Sugar Land, TX
3.0%
-0.8%
16
12
Jersey, NJ – Long Island, NY
3.0%
1.2%
13
13
2.5%
-4.7%
33
14
Vancouver, OR – Beaverton, OR
1.9%
-3.5%
27
15
CO
1.8%
3.3%
7
16
Sunnyvale, CA – Santa Clara, CA
1.6%
-2.5%
21
17
Metairie, LA – Kenner, LA
1.6%
-2.9%
24
18
1.5%
-7.3%
41
19
Cambridge, MA – Quincy, MA
1.4%
0.1%
14
20
1.4%
11.5%
1
21
1.1%
-1.2%
19
22
NewBedford, MA – Fall River, MA
1.0%
2.6%
9
23
0.4%
2.5%
10
24
Oakland, CA – Fremont, CA
0.1%
-4.7%
35
25
Waukesha, WI – West Allis, WI
0.1%
4.5%
5
26
-0.2%
4.7%
4
27
Gastonia,NC – Concord, NC
-1.5%
-2.2%
20
28
-2.0%
-3.5%
26
29
Middletown, OH
-2.2%
-4.1%
31
30
Norfolk, VA – Newport News, VA
-2.3%
-4.4%
32
31
St.Paul, MN – Bloomington, WI
-2.4%
-8.7%
44
32
Hartford, CT – East Hartford, CT
-2.4%
-3.6%
28
33
-3.0%
-3.7%
29
34
CA – Roseville, CA
-3.3%
-6.9%
40
35
-3.6%
-9.4%
46
36
Hoover, AL
-3.8%
-11.1%
48
37
Davidson, TN – Murfreesboro, TN
-3.8%
-4.8%
36
38
-3.8%
-5.9%
38
39
CA – San Marcos, CA
-3.8%
-4.7%
34
40
-3.9%
-7.7%
42
41
Camden, NJ – Wilmington, DE
-4.1%
-5.0%
37
42
Bernardino, CA – Ontario, CA
-4.2%
-3.4%
25
43
Towson, MD
-4.9%
-6.2%
39
44
Naperville, IL – Joliet, IL
-5.2%
-2.6%
23
45
MI – Livonia, MI
-5.6%
-10.8%
47
46
Paradise, NV
-6.4%
-9.2%
45
47
Oaks, CA – Ventura, CA
-6.7%
-7.8%
43
48
WA – Bellevue, WA
-7.5%
-15.1%
49
49
Beach, CA – Santa Ana, CA
-10.3%
-3.7%
30
50
Springs, GA – Marietta, GA
-14.4%
-18.3%
50
Top
2012: The Forecast in Perspective
Although the range of movement for U.S. prices
stabilized through 2011, prices have settled at the lowest level since early
2001 (see Chart 3 below). The forecast for 2012 shows home prices starting with
a dip in the first quarter, improving in the spring and summer buying season,
and continuing to climb to 0.2% overall growth for 2012.
Chart 3: Relative Index Value (2000 – 2011 Observed and 2012 Forecast)
For 2012: Buyer Beware
Although “stable” and “flat”
have been used to describe the performance of 2011 and forecast for 2012, the
performance of individual metro markets has not been flat at all. In fact,
metros across the nation have experienced an interesting balance of increases
and losses, that when averaged, create an impression that metro markets across
the U.S. are stable.
Individual markets reacting to their local
economic conditions continued to exhibit a wide range of performance levels in
2011, with only 12 of the top 50 metro markets (24%), returning year-over-year
price movement that can be considered stable – price swings of less than 2.5
percentage points. This will continue into 2012, with only 40% being considered
stable.
Chart 4 (below) indicates the forecasted
movement of 50 metros within our 2012 forecast. It includes the forecasted 0.2%
increase as the black horizontal line, and the metro markets that are within
+/- 2.5% of zero change in red to represent price stability. The chart shows 20
of 50 markets shown to be stable, with the rest being above 2.5% increases or
below -2.5% declines.
Chart 4: Distribution of 2012 Forecast Yearly Price Changes (Top
50 Markets)
This large expected fluctuation in home prices
among the individual markets speaks to the importance of regularly tracking
each market’s performance as numerous dynamics, including varying REO
saturation and unemployment levels, are still very much in play.
Success in 2012′s real estate market will be
driven by picking markets carefully and fully understanding local drivers.
Top
About the Clear Capital Home Data Index (HDI) Market Report
The Clear Capital HDI Market Report provides
insights into market trends and other leading indices for the real estate
market at the national and local levels. A critical difference in the value of
the HDI Market Report is the capability of Clear Capital to provide more timely
and granular reporting than other home price index providers.
The Clear Capital HDI Market Report:
industry (investors, lenders and servicers), government agencies and the public
insight into the most recent pricing conditions, not only at the national and
metropolitan level, but within local markets as well.
recent information available from recorder/assessor offices, and then further
enhanced by adding the company’s proprietary streaming market data for the most
comprehensive geographic coverage and local insights available.
coverage of sales transactions and aggregates this comprehensive dataset at ten
different geographic levels, including hundreds of metropolitan statistical
areas (MSAs) and sub-ZIP code boundaries.
equally-weighted distressed bank owned sales (REOs) from around the country to
give the most real world look of pricing dynamics across all sales types.
current market data by providing more frequent updates with patent-pending
rolling quarter technology. This ensures decisions are based on the most
up-to-date information available.
Clear Capital Home Data Index™ Methodology
indices in patent pending rolling quarter intervals that compare the most
recent four months to the previous three months. The rolling quarters have no
fixed start date and can be used to generate indices as data flows in,
significantly reducing the multi-month lag time experienced with other indices.
market and institutional (real estate owned) transactions, giving equal weight
to all market transactions and identifying price tiers at a market specific
level. By giving equal weight to all transactions the HDI is truly
representative of each unique market.
address-level cascade create an index with the most granular, statistically
significant market area available.
weighted repeat sale and price-per-square-foot indices that use multiple sale
types, including single-family homes, multi-family homes and condominiums.
About Clear Capital
Clear Capital (www.clearcapital.com) is a
premium provider of data and solutions for real estate asset valuation and risk
assessment for large financial services companies. Our products include
appraisals, broker-price opinions, property condition inspections, value
reconciliations, and home data indices. Clear Capital’s combination of
progressive technology, high caliber in-house staff and a well-trained network
of more than 40,000 field experts sets a new standard for accurate, up-to-date
and well documented valuation data and assessments. The Company’s customers
include the largest U.S. banks, investment firms and other financial
organizations.
Legend
Home Data Index (HDI) – Powerful analytics
tool that provides contextual data augmenting other, human-based valuation
tools. Clear Capital’s multi-model approach combines address-level accuracy
with the most current proprietary home pricing data available.
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) – Geographic entities defined by the U.S.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies
in collecting, tabulating, and publishing Federal statistics.
Real Estate Owned (REO) Saturation – Calculates the percentage of REOs sold as
compared to all properties sold in the last rolling quarter.
Rolling Quarters – Clear Capital uses patent pending rolling
quarter intervals to compare the most recent three months and a fourth month of
proprietary data against the previous three months. We include the most current
fourth month of proprietary pricing data, because it often contains the most
relevant and insightful information.
The information contained in this report is
based on sources that are deemed to be reliable; however no representation or
warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any
particular purpose of any information contained herein. This report is not
intended as investment advice, and should not be viewed as any guarantee of
value, condition, or other attribute.
Media Contact:
Michelle Sabolich
Atomic PR for Clear Capital
(415) 593-1400
michelle.sabolich@atomicpr.com
Tags: Central Virginia Real Estate, Funny commentary, Housing Statistics, Investment Properties, Real Estate Market Analysis, Richmond Virginia Real Estate, Virginia Real Estate