So ya wanna start dating again??? Buy a Home!!!!

Yes, it is true!

Renters lead lonely lives of desperation….or perhaps they lead quiet  lives of unabashed happiness.  Either way, if YOU ARE SINGLE and want to start
dating Just buy a Home and Happy Days will be Here Again!!  Below are the results of a Trulia Poll which shows that owning a home is a Major
Aphrodisiac!  What Can I say!!!  And guess what.  Living at home with your mother is a major turn-off to prospective Dates.  What a surprise!!!
Sooooooo, if you or anybody you know is single and wants to start dating just have them call
me, the Love Doctor Realtor Rick Stockel and I will sell you/them a home and help you/them find LOOOOOOVVVVVEEEEE!!
What a great Two for One Deal.  Call or Text me at 804-218-3143 or send me an e-mail at rstockjr@aol.com.  Until my next Blog Post….If you are thinking Real Estate ……Think Rick Stockel…..

Want a date? Buy a home By Les Christie@CNNMoneyFebruary 14, 2012: 5:30 AM ET

When it comes to dating, homeownership can be the ultimate aphrodisiac. NEW YORK (CNNMoney) –

When it comes to dating, homeownership can be the ultimate aphrodisiac. In a survey of 1,000 single people, more than a third of women and 18% of men said they would much rather date a homeowner than a renter.

Only 2% of women said they preferred to date a man who rents, while only 3% of men said they would choose a woman who rents over one that owns her home, according to the survey, which was conducted by Harris Interactive for real estate site Trulia. Both sexes also clearly prefer it when there’s no roommate in the picture; 62% of survey respondents, men and women, prefer to date singles who live alone. I’m home!!  Adult children who move back in with parents was bad news for the growing number of boomerang kids — the young adults who went off to college, graduated and then wound up back in their old bedrooms. It’s going to be hard to find love, except (perhaps) from your parents. Less than 5% of all singles surveyed said they would date someone living in their childhood homes. “That’s a real deal-breaker,” said Michael Corbett, a spokesman for Trulia. “If you’re still living with your folks, you’re dead-on-arrival for dating.” Trulia also asked which home features are the biggest turn-ons. Number one turned out to be a master bath. Men (64%) love that private sanctum almost as much as women (75%) do. Walk-in closets were cited by 55% of men and 72% of women and gourmet kitchens got 51% of the male vote and 62% of the female. Hardwood floors, outdoor decks and home theaters also came in high on the list. Interestingly enough, hot tubs got a lot less love from respondents. Only 26% of men and 22% of women cited the old standby in the science of seduction as an amenity they would truly want.  Well you know this isn’t the 70′s anymore.

Share

Tags: , , , , ,

Final 2011 and Projected 2012 Real Estate Data from the Clear Capital Economic Report! Where do we go from Here??

Well let me just say that I am an amateur musicologist
(very amateur so says my wife Linda). I love most all types of music (yes Vern,
even Country, Rap and Hip Hop sans songs with curse words and Misanthropic
content.)
So with that in mind please feel free to listen to these two beautiful
songs on YouTube before you start reading my fairly optimistic 2012 real estate
projections for Central Virginia. Of course I can hear you saying, “Heck (or worse) Rick, anything must be better than the 20%+- drop
we have seen in housing prices here in the Richmond area over the past 5 years.
I would say that is a fair comment but who truly believed that the Titanic would
sink? It can always get worse. But I am happy to prognosticate that I believe
that the Real Estate Market in Central Virginia will actually float and not sink
any further by the end of 2012.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IhveV-_VMo
Chicago: Where do we go from here?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se8e3oiGjGA
Alicia Keys: Where do we go from here?
Directly below are my comments regarding the 2011 and the 2012 Real Estate
Markets and below that is the actual full Clear Capital Housing Market Report.
Feel free to peruse it and formulate your own opinions.
I will now show the highlights of the report and give you my opinions about
those highlights. I guess I am entitled to do so since it is my Blog after
all:)
OK!!
Nationally overall housing prices fell 2.1% which was a result of a 2nd
half steadiness in prices and a decreasing number of Foreclosures on the
market.
Clear Capital forecasts that home prices on a national basis will show a
.2% increase at the end of the year. Don’t get too excited
as there is a decimal (.) before that 2
Nationally housing prices at the end of 2011 were at or about 2001 prices.
WHEW!! Thank goodness we are out of that
decade!!!
Clear Capital had the Richmond Metro Real Estate Market ranked 38 out of
the top 50 major Real Estate Markets.  Richmond is projected to rank 38 out of
50 again for 2012.  At least we are consistent.  (Here is where I have a slightly different take).
Central Virginia’s housing prices dropped on average 5.9% year over year
from 2010 to 2011.  The Great News going forward is that the 4th Quarter of 2011
vs the 4th Quarter of 2010 only showed a decrease of .9%.  This shows a fairly significant stabilizing of housing prices in
our area in the 4th quarter of 2011 going forward into 2012.  Additionally, the
Richmond Metro area had a Foreclosure (REO) saturation rate of 18.3% in 2011.
That means that 18.3% of all home sales in the Richmond Metro area were
foreclosures.  While this number is historically high for Central Virginia it
is much lower than the national average rate of foreclosure sales to total sales
of 24.8%.  This is significant since foreclosure sales are a huge reason for the
decrease in housing prices. Distressed properties typically sell at a discount
bringing down the non-foreclosure pricing.  If we see a lessening of foreclosure
homes on the market the natural supply and demand of homes will start to
reappear. 
The Big News coming out of Washington DC this
week is that there is a government (PLEASE DON’T CRINGE) plan which would allow
investors to make large bulk purchases of foreclosures homes (50, 100, 250 homes
at a time in one sale).  This would clear many foreclosure homes from the
selling side of the supply and demand curve as it would decrease the overall supply of
homes.  Investor purchasers would have to keep these large lot purchased homes
as rentals for a given time period.  The net effect of this
would be a clearing of distressed properties from the housing market. Investors
would sustain most of the risk on these purchases and would have to rehab them
before renting them if need be.  Families whose credit was ruined due to losing
a home would now have additional rental options. 
Clear Capital predicts that Richmond will show a loss of 3.8% in home
prices in 2012 vs a loss of 5.9% in 2011.  In a static world that may very well
be a great guess.  In the past 3 years I was even more pessimistic because I
knew the underlying effect of falling home prices was due to the loss of several
major corporations and many other smaller firms in Central Virginia.  However,
my boots on the ground investigation, thorough reading of the daily Richmond
Times Dispatch business page (plug for the RTD:  Free Subscription anybody?)
and listening to my golden voiced buddy Jay Hart at WRVA
shows that many firms are now hiring and that there are many new firms coming to our
area. ie Amazon.  Also, many firms are hiring but not making big announcements.
“What’s in Your Wallet?”. 
drumroll please……..Here are my 2012 predictions for
housing prices in Central Virginia.  I will do so by quarter. 
The 1st Quarter will see a slight lowering of prices due to
seasonality.  What I mean is that January through March is typically the 2nd
slowest quarter for homes sale in our area due to the cooler weather and the
fact that families’ with school age children do not want to move during the
middle of a school year.   I predict a drop of 1% to 1 1/2% in home prices
during the 1st Quarter. 
This will be the best time
for a buyer to buy a home and ESPECIALLY for an Investor to buy a home due to
the fact that the 2nd slowest period of sales is the 1st quarter of a year and
the slowest quarter of sales is the last quarter of a year.  After 6 months of
slow sales Sellers are typically more willing to make concessions.  JANUARY,
FEBRUARY and MARCH will get the Buyer the best prices on homes.  Sellers will
have to be price flexible to make a sale in this quarter. 
(SHAMELESS PLUG FOR MYSELF: 
CALL OR TEXT ME NOW AT
804-218-3143 TO BUY OR LIST A HOME THIS YEAR)
2nd Quarter sales will be the strongest of the year. The Sunshine Effect or Daylight Savings Time Effect or SPRING FEVER whatever you want to call it comes into play. Folks are tired of hunkering down in their homes for the winter and Thoughts of Sugarplums run through their minds. oops wrong quarter. But thoughts of New Places to live definitely run through their heads. With perhaps the end of the ridiculously low mortgage rates coming to be, buyers will get off the fence and lock in on the low rates with 30 year cheap money mortgages. Prices will firm as there will finally be an increase in demand and I look for an increase in prices in Central Virginia of 1 1/2% to 2% during this second quarter. This will be the Best Time for Sellers to get their homes sold. Just to be clear, this pricing power for sellers does
NOT mean every house will be sold and that you will get Cadillac prices.
Sellers will still have to have updated homes with some obvious upgrades to get
their homes sold.  If you have an outdated home or are situated on an
undesirable lot then you will have to sell at a discount.  But overall this will
be a good quarter in terms of housing prices for Central Virginia.
3rd Quarter sales are typically the 2nd best quarter in Central Virginia.
That will remain so in 2012.  Fence Sitters among others will finally start
buying homes and will be more motivated to do so for fear of rising interest
rates and finally rising home prices.  Nobody can consistently time any market
and the fear factor of missing this rising market’s bottom will spur sales.
How many Dot.com investors are among my blog readers?   dos
users?  candle users?  chastity belt users?  vinyl 45 users?  tulip bulb
hoarders?  I think you get the point.  We better get on the train for fear of
missing it and having to walk to Hoboken will
be the mindset.  Would you
want to have to walk to Hoboken?  Like I said, Don’t miss that train!!
Look for an increase in home prices of around 1% in the 3rd quarter of 2012.
The 4th quarter is typically the slowest (or 4th best quarter if you are an
optimist) quarter for homes sales in Central Virginia.  This is the quarter
where thoughts of Sugarplums run through our heads.  Families with children are
typically settled in and don’t want to make a move outside of their current
school district.  Most folks are hunkered down as we head into the Holiday
Season and the beginning of winter.  This is typically another good time to be a
buyer or an investor buyer as there are less overall buyers in the market.  (I
swear this is true) some sellers truly get caught up in the spirit of the
season/or give in to frustration and are willing to make a deal to start the new
year fresh.  The first and last quarters of a year are where my investor clients
get their best prices especially on foreclosure sales.  Bank/Fannie/Freddie
asset managers want to end the year with less inventory and want to start the
year with good sales numbers when the demand is at its lowest.  My prediction is
for a negative 1% to even rate of home prices for the final quarter of 2012 in
the Central Virginia Market area.
Here is my worst case scenario for home prices in Central Virginia for
2012.   Flat prices at 0% increase from 2011.  My best case scenario for 2012 is
for an increase of 2%.  Not Great but trending in the right direction.  Also
much better than the prediction by Clear Capital of a decrease of 3.8%.
Please do me a favor:) Remind me how right or
how wrong I am as we travel through this year.  I will publish Clear Capital’s
economic data
  on a regular basis so I can’t
hide from my projections.  Trust me if I am correct on my projections I will
remind you ad nauseam.  I may happen to have amnesia if my projections are
wrong.  Speaking of that: Does anybody know the way to San
Jose?    WOW, San Jose is projected by Clear Capital to be the 16th best real
estate market in 2012.  I better get those directions if I am wrong.

Market Report

Clear Capital®: U.S. Home Prices Down in 2011, but Market Stability Forecasted
for 2012

While year-over-year prices notched down in 2011, prices are
expected to see slight uptick in 2012, the first time in positive territory
since 2006.

TRUCKEE, Calif. – Jan. 9, 2012 – Clear Capital (www.clearcapital.com),
released its monthly Home Data Index™ (HDI) Market Report, with news of a
year-over-year national price change in 2011 of -2.1%, and forecast of a slight
0.2% gain in 2012.

Report highlights include:

  • 2011′s decrease of
    -2.1% year-over-year was bolstered by a stabilizing of prices in the latter
    half of the year and decreasing REO saturation.
  • In 2012, U.S. home
    prices are forecasted to show continued stabilization with a slight gain of
    0.2% across all markets, remaining near levels not seen since back in 2001.
  • Importance of
    micro-market analysis is reiterated as the 2012 forecast is for a flat U.S.
    market, but only 40% of individual markets (20 of 50) are projected to be
    stable.

“Overall, 2011 was a relatively quiet year for
U.S. home prices compared to the last five years,” said Dr. Alex Villacorta,
Director of Research and Analytics at Clear Capital. “With national prices down
a little more than two percent for the year and sitting at their lowest point
since 2001, our projections show that the current balance the market has found
will continue through 2012.”

“However, individual markets reacting to their
local economic drivers exhibit a wide range of performance levels,” added Dr.
Villacorta.“Although the national numbers suggest markets are flat, when
looking at individual metro markets it turns out only 24% of them showed signs
of stabilization in 2011, while the others are still moving more dramatically
higher or lower. What’s most interesting is that the lower segments of
appreciating markets are driving much of the current price growth. In places
like Florida, which have historically been hard hit, we are now seeing
considerable activity in lower-end properties as demand continues to heat up.”

2011: Quarter-over-Quarter Numbers Reflect Seasonality

U.S. prices declined -0.4% in December on a
quarter-over-quarter basis, showing the markets giving back some of the gains
of the summer buying season. This is the first cooling off after six monthly
reports showing minimal quarterly gains. In fact, the most recent six months of
the year (June – December) saw national home prices flat at -0.1%.

While these national quarterly numbers for
December fell slightly, half of the major markets covered saw quarterly gains.
Dayton, OH checked in at the top of highest quarterly performers with a gain of
5.0%. On the downside, Atlanta, GA showed consistent weakness as December’s
lowest performing major market with a loss of -8.4% quarter-over-quarter.

In addition to the relatively flat home price
performance, national REO saturation rates at the end of 2011 reached a new
yearly low at 24.8%. REO saturation was volatile early in 2011, and showed
consistent declines and stability toward the latter half of the year.

Top



2011: U.S. Numbers Stable Over the Year

The -2.1% price decline in 2011 marked the
smallest year-end change in either direction since the market gained 1.7% in
2006. The majority of the downturn was early in the year through May, with
upticks hitting during the summer buying season, and then remaining stable
through the fall and early winter.

Regional trends revealed a bit more price
variability. The Northeast’s meager 0.1% yearly gain led the nation, comparing
favorably to the -1.3%, -3.0% and -4.4% price declines turned in by the South,
Midwest and West, respectively.

While the changes in prices across the U.S.
were mild for 2011, there were notable extremes at the positive and negative
sides of the market. Four metros posted price declines greater than 10%, with
Atlanta leading the way down with a -18.3% price change, followed by Seattle,
WA at -15.1%. Birmingham, AL and Detroit, MI also rode the markets down with
-11.1% and -10.8% price drops, respectively. Each of the markets with double
digit declines saw an increase in the percentage of sales that were REOs
through the year.

On the positive side, Dayton enjoyed 11.5%
annual price growth in 2011. The next two strongest performers came from
Florida, with Orlando and Miami basking in 6.7% and 5.6% price gains,
respectively. Just as increasing REO saturation affected our worst performers,
decreasing REO saturation for these three markets in 2011 (Dayton down 12.3%,
Orlando down 21.0% and Miami down 9.9%) appeared to buoy their home prices for
the year. Chart 1 below shows all metro markets ranked by their yearly numbers,
and includes quarterly performance and REO saturation measured at the end of the
year.

Chart 1: 2011 Observed

Major U.S. Metro Markets (2011 Observed)

Qtr/Qtr

Rank

Metropolitan
Statistical Area

2011 Observed Yr/Yr

2011 Observed Qtr/Qtr

REO Saturation

1

Dayton, OH

11.5%

5.0%

29.2%

2

Orlando, FL

6.7%

3.2%

24.9%

3

Miami, FL – Ft.
Lauderdale, FL – Miami Beach, FL

5.6%

1.7%

31.3%

4

Rochester, NY

4.7%

2.1%

3.5%

5

Milwaukee, WI –
Waukesha, WI – West Allis, WI

4.5%

-0.3%

19.9%

6

Washington, DC –
Arlington, VA – Alexandria, VA

3.5%

4.7%

11.8%

7

Denver, CO – Aurora,
CO

3.3%

3.0%

22.5%

8

Dallas, TX – Fort
Worth, TX – Arlington, TX

2.7%

0.7%

28.5%

9

Providence, RI –
NewBedford, MA – Fall River, MA

2.6%

-3.4%

14.5%

10

Pittsburgh, PA

2.5%

0.0%

6.1%

11

Jacksonville, FL

1.7%

0.1%

27.9%

12

Phoenix, AZ – Mesa, AZ
– Scottsdale, AZ

1.5%

2.7%

32.9%

13

NY, NY – No. New
Jersey, NJ – Long Island, NY

1.2%

0.6%

7.0%

14

Boston, MA –
Cambridge, MA – Quincy, MA

0.1%

0.2%

8.7%

15

Tampa, FL – St.
Petersburg, FL – Clearwater, FL

-0.6%

2.1%

23.7%

16

Houston, TX – Baytown,
TX – Sugar Land, TX

-0.8%

1.8%

27.6%

17

Honolulu, HI

-0.8%

1.6%

7.4%

18

Cleveland, OH –
Elyria, OH – Mentor, OH

-1.1%

0.9%

31.1%

19

Oklahoma City, OK

-1.2%

-1.6%

12.3%

20

Charlotte, NC –
Gastonia,NC – Concord, NC

-2.2%

-0.3%

13.3%

21

San Jose, CA –
Sunnyvale, CA – Santa Clara, CA

-2.5%

-0.1%

16.3%

22

Bakersfield, CA

-2.6%

0.5%

42.7%

23

Chicago, IL –
Naperville, IL – Joliet, IL

-2.6%

0.6%

29.9%

24

New Orleans, LA –
Metairie, LA – Kenner, LA

-2.9%

-1.9%

20.6%

25

Riverside, CA – San
Bernardino, CA – Ontario, CA

-3.4%

-1.7%

42.2%

26

Columbus, OH

-3.5%

0.3%

33.9%

27

Portland, OR –
Vancouver, OR – Beaverton, OR

-3.5%

0.8%

15.5%

28

Hartford, CT – West
Hartford, CT – East Hartford, CT

-3.6%

0.4%

5.4%

29

Raleigh, NC – Cary, NC

-3.7%

-0.9%

5.6%

30

Los Angeles, CA – Long
Beach, CA – Santa Ana, CA

-3.7%

-2.3%

28.9%

31

Cincinnati, OH –
Middletown, OH

-4.1%

-0.4%

22.3%

32

Virginia Beach, VA –
Norfolk, VA – Newport News, VA

-4.4%

1.2%

20.0%

33

Memphis, TN

-4.7%

-6.4%

37.4%

34

San Diego, CA –
Carlsbad, CA – San Marcos, CA

-4.7%

0.1%

24.3%

35

San Francisco, CA –
Oakland, CA – Fremont, CA

-4.7%

5.0%

3.3%

36

Nashville, TN –
Davidson, TN – Murfreesboro, TN

-4.8%

-0.8%

17.1%

37

Philadelphia, PA –
Camden, NJ – Wilmington, DE

-5.0%

-2.5%

9.9%

38

Richmond, VA

-5.9%

-0.9%

18.3%

39

Baltimore, MD –
Towson, MD

-6.2%

-1.7%

14.2%

40

Sacramento, CA –
Arden, CA – Roseville, CA

-6.9%

-0.1%

34.0%

41

Fresno, CA

-7.3%

0.5%

38.6%

42

St. Louis, MO

-7.7%

-0.9%

25.9%

43

Oxnard, CA – Thousand
Oaks, CA – Ventura, CA

-7.8%

-3.7%

28.0%

44

Minneapolis, MN –
St.Paul, MN – Bloomington, WI

-8.7%

-0.5%

42.1%

45

Las Vegas, NV – Paradise,
NV

-9.2%

-2.0%

46.5%

46

Tucson, AZ

-9.4%

-1.5%

39.2%

47

Detroit, MI – Warren,
MI – Livonia, MI

-10.8%

-4.7%

48.4%

48

Birmingham, AL –
Hoover, AL

-11.1%

4.3%

34.0%

49

Seattle, WA – Tacoma,
WA – Bellevue, WA

-15.1%

-3.7%

19.7%

50

Atlanta, GA – Sandy
Springs, GA – Marietta, GA

-18.3%

-8.4%

42.2%

Top



Looking To 2012: The End of Five Years of Declines?

  • U.S. price gains forecasted
    at 0.2% for 2012.
  • Various metros
    continue to be volatile, some double digit gains and losses are expected.
  • Florida markets
    predicted to lead recovery as all four markets expect solid increases.

On the national level, 2012 is expected to
play out much like the last half of 2011, with a very subtle price change. A
minimal decline in the beginning of the year is expected to turn into a meager
gain by year’s end. At a more granular level, half of the 50 major metro
markets are expected to post gains for the year, and individual metros will
experience the full gamut of price movement, from double-digit growth to
double-digit drops.

Double digit volatility can be seen with the
two strongest markets, including Orlando with a healthy price increase of
11.7%, and Bakersfield close behind with a projected 11.1% increase. The
deepest drops come from Atlanta with an expected drop of -14.4%, and Los
Angeles with a predicted drop of -10.3%.

Chart 2 (below) shows the 2012 forecast with
each market ranked by year-over-year performance, and includes 2011
year-over-year performance and ranking of those markets for comparison.

Following Orlando’s lead, other Florida
markets are expected to extend their impressive 2011 performances into 2012.
Miami and Tampa are projected to be among the five highest performing metros
with 8.8% and 7.4% growth, respectively, and Jacksonville is forecasted to gain
4.3%, placing it at a respectable eighth among the top metro markets. The
exceptional growth in these markets can be a result of several factors,
including being hit especially hard in the downturn. While fighting back, they
remain significantly off their highs of 2006. Other factors in play in these
markets include large increases in the values of their lower priced homes (near
double-digits for all markets) when compared to higher priced segments of the
market, and a high percentage of all cash transactions (51.8%) when compared to
other metros. This indicates a high degree of investor activity as they look
for bargains in the region, driving up demand.

Chart 2: 2012 Forecast

50 Major U.S. Metro Markets Price Change (2012 Forecast)

Qtr/Qtr

Rank

Metropolitan
Statistical Area

2012 Forecast Yr/Yr

2011 Observed Yr/Yr

2011 Observed Rank

1

Orlando, FL

11.7%

6.7%

2

2

Bakersfield, CA

11.1%

-2.6%

22

3

Washington, DC –
Arlington, VA – Alexandria, VA

9.3%

3.5%

6

4

Phoenix, AZ – Mesa, AZ
– Scottsdale, AZ

8.9%

1.5%

12

5

Miami, FL – Ft.
Lauderdale, FL – Miami Beach, FL

8.8%

5.6%

3

6

Tampa, FL – St.
Petersburg, FL – Clearwater, FL

7.4%

-0.6%

15

7

Dallas, TX – Fort
Worth, TX – Arlington, TX

5.8%

2.7%

8

8

Jacksonville, FL

4.3%

1.7%

11

9

Cleveland, OH –
Elyria, OH – Mentor, OH

4.2%

-1.1%

18

10

Honolulu, HI

3.2%

-0.8%

17

11

Houston, TX – Baytown,
TX – Sugar Land, TX

3.0%

-0.8%

16

12

New York, NY – No. New
Jersey, NJ – Long Island, NY

3.0%

1.2%

13

13

Memphis, TN

2.5%

-4.7%

33

14

Portland, OR –
Vancouver, OR – Beaverton, OR

1.9%

-3.5%

27

15

Denver, CO – Aurora,
CO

1.8%

3.3%

7

16

San Jose, CA –
Sunnyvale, CA – Santa Clara, CA

1.6%

-2.5%

21

17

New Orleans, LA –
Metairie, LA – Kenner, LA

1.6%

-2.9%

24

18

Fresno, CA

1.5%

-7.3%

41

19

Boston, MA –
Cambridge, MA – Quincy, MA

1.4%

0.1%

14

20

Dayton, OH

1.4%

11.5%

1

21

Oklahoma City, OK

1.1%

-1.2%

19

22

Providence, RI –
NewBedford, MA – Fall River, MA

1.0%

2.6%

9

23

Pittsburgh, PA

0.4%

2.5%

10

24

San Francisco, CA –
Oakland, CA – Fremont, CA

0.1%

-4.7%

35

25

Milwaukee, WI –
Waukesha, WI – West Allis, WI

0.1%

4.5%

5

26

Rochester, NY

-0.2%

4.7%

4

27

Charlotte, NC –
Gastonia,NC – Concord, NC

-1.5%

-2.2%

20

28

Columbus, OH

-2.0%

-3.5%

26

29

Cincinnati, OH –
Middletown, OH

-2.2%

-4.1%

31

30

Virginia Beach, VA –
Norfolk, VA – Newport News, VA

-2.3%

-4.4%

32

31

Minneapolis, MN –
St.Paul, MN – Bloomington, WI

-2.4%

-8.7%

44

32

Hartford, CT – West
Hartford, CT – East Hartford, CT

-2.4%

-3.6%

28

33

Raleigh, NC – Cary, NC

-3.0%

-3.7%

29

34

Sacramento, CA – Arden,
CA – Roseville, CA

-3.3%

-6.9%

40

35

Tucson, AZ

-3.6%

-9.4%

46

36

Birmingham, AL –
Hoover, AL

-3.8%

-11.1%

48

37

Nashville, TN –
Davidson, TN – Murfreesboro, TN

-3.8%

-4.8%

36

38

Richmond, VA

-3.8%

-5.9%

38

39

San Diego, CA – Carlsbad,
CA – San Marcos, CA

-3.8%

-4.7%

34

40

St. Louis, MO

-3.9%

-7.7%

42

41

Philadelphia, PA –
Camden, NJ – Wilmington, DE

-4.1%

-5.0%

37

42

Riverside, CA – San
Bernardino, CA – Ontario, CA

-4.2%

-3.4%

25

43

Baltimore, MD –
Towson, MD

-4.9%

-6.2%

39

44

Chicago, IL –
Naperville, IL – Joliet, IL

-5.2%

-2.6%

23

45

Detroit, MI – Warren,
MI – Livonia, MI

-5.6%

-10.8%

47

46

Las Vegas, NV –
Paradise, NV

-6.4%

-9.2%

45

47

Oxnard, CA – Thousand
Oaks, CA – Ventura, CA

-6.7%

-7.8%

43

48

Seattle, WA – Tacoma,
WA – Bellevue, WA

-7.5%

-15.1%

49

49

Los Angeles, CA – Long
Beach, CA – Santa Ana, CA

-10.3%

-3.7%

30

50

Atlanta, GA – Sandy
Springs, GA – Marietta, GA

-14.4%

-18.3%

50

Top



2012: The Forecast in Perspective

Although the range of movement for U.S. prices
stabilized through 2011, prices have settled at the lowest level since early
2001 (see Chart 3 below). The forecast for 2012 shows home prices starting with
a dip in the first quarter, improving in the spring and summer buying season,
and continuing to climb to 0.2% overall growth for 2012.

Chart 3: Relative Index Value (2000 – 2011 Observed and 2012 Forecast)

For 2012: Buyer Beware

Although “stable” and “flat”
have been used to describe the performance of 2011 and forecast for 2012, the
performance of individual metro markets has not been flat at all. In fact,
metros across the nation have experienced an interesting balance of increases
and losses, that when averaged, create an impression that metro markets across
the U.S. are stable.

Individual markets reacting to their local
economic conditions continued to exhibit a wide range of performance levels in
2011, with only 12 of the top 50 metro markets (24%), returning year-over-year
price movement that can be considered stable – price swings of less than 2.5
percentage points. This will continue into 2012, with only 40% being considered
stable.

Chart 4 (below) indicates the forecasted
movement of 50 metros within our 2012 forecast. It includes the forecasted 0.2%
increase as the black horizontal line, and the metro markets that are within
+/- 2.5% of zero change in red to represent price stability. The chart shows 20
of 50 markets shown to be stable, with the rest being above 2.5% increases or
below -2.5% declines.

Chart 4: Distribution of 2012 Forecast Yearly Price Changes (Top
50 Markets)

 

This large expected fluctuation in home prices
among the individual markets speaks to the importance of regularly tracking
each market’s performance as numerous dynamics, including varying REO
saturation and unemployment levels, are still very much in play.

Success in 2012′s real estate market will be
driven by picking markets carefully and fully understanding local drivers.

Top



About the Clear Capital Home Data Index (HDI) Market Report

The Clear Capital HDI Market Report provides
insights into market trends and other leading indices for the real estate
market at the national and local levels. A critical difference in the value of
the HDI Market Report is the capability of Clear Capital to provide more timely
and granular reporting than other home price index providers.

The Clear Capital HDI Market Report:

  • Offers the real estate
    industry (investors, lenders and servicers), government agencies and the public
    insight into the most recent pricing conditions, not only at the national and
    metropolitan level, but within local markets as well.
  • Is built on the most
    recent information available from recorder/assessor offices, and then further
    enhanced by adding the company’s proprietary streaming market data for the most
    comprehensive geographic coverage and local insights available.
  • Reflects nationwide
    coverage of sales transactions and aggregates this comprehensive dataset at ten
    different geographic levels, including hundreds of metropolitan statistical
    areas (MSAs) and sub-ZIP code boundaries.
  • Includes
    equally-weighted distressed bank owned sales (REOs) from around the country to
    give the most real world look of pricing dynamics across all sales types.
  • Allows for the most
    current market data by providing more frequent updates with patent-pending
    rolling quarter technology. This ensures decisions are based on the most
    up-to-date information available.

Clear Capital Home Data Index™ Methodology

  • Generates the timeliest
    indices in patent pending rolling quarter intervals that compare the most
    recent four months to the previous three months. The rolling quarters have no
    fixed start date and can be used to generate indices as data flows in,
    significantly reducing the multi-month lag time experienced with other indices.
  • Includes both fair
    market and institutional (real estate owned) transactions, giving equal weight
    to all market transactions and identifying price tiers at a market specific
    level. By giving equal weight to all transactions the HDI is truly
    representative of each unique market.
  • Results from an
    address-level cascade create an index with the most granular, statistically
    significant market area available.
  • Provides classes of
    weighted repeat sale and price-per-square-foot indices that use multiple sale
    types, including single-family homes, multi-family homes and condominiums.

About Clear Capital

Clear Capital (www.clearcapital.com) is a
premium provider of data and solutions for real estate asset valuation and risk
assessment for large financial services companies. Our products include
appraisals, broker-price opinions, property condition inspections, value
reconciliations, and home data indices. Clear Capital’s combination of
progressive technology, high caliber in-house staff and a well-trained network
of more than 40,000 field experts sets a new standard for accurate, up-to-date
and well documented valuation data and assessments. The Company’s customers
include the largest U.S. banks, investment firms and other financial
organizations.

Legend

Home Data Index (HDI) – Powerful analytics
tool that provides contextual data augmenting other, human-based valuation
tools. Clear Capital’s multi-model approach combines address-level accuracy
with the most current proprietary home pricing data available.

Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) – Geographic entities defined by the U.S.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for use by Federal statistical agencies
in collecting, tabulating, and publishing Federal statistics.

Real Estate Owned (REO) Saturation – Calculates the percentage of REOs sold as
compared to all properties sold in the last rolling quarter.

Rolling Quarters – Clear Capital uses patent pending rolling
quarter intervals to compare the most recent three months and a fourth month of
proprietary data against the previous three months. We include the most current
fourth month of proprietary pricing data, because it often contains the most
relevant and insightful information.

The information contained in this report is
based on sources that are deemed to be reliable; however no representation or
warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any
particular purpose of any information contained herein. This report is not
intended as investment advice, and should not be viewed as any guarantee of
value, condition, or other attribute.

Media Contact:

Michelle Sabolich

Atomic PR for Clear Capital

(415) 593-1400

michelle.sabolich@atomicpr.com

 

Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

National Association of Realtors®. Existing Home Sales numbers for November 2011. Is “NOT BAD NEWS” GOOD NEWS?

Here are the latest resale home sale numbers straight from the horse’s mouth.  The National Association of Realtors being the horse.  The problem is that NAR gave bad data from their economics department for the past several years where they significantly overstated the actual number of resale home sales.   I am not sure if the current data is from the Front end of the horse or the Back end of the Horse.  So I will take it with a grain of salt.  HOWEVER, IF I USE ANECDOTAL EVEDINCE BASED ON MY BUYER CLIENTS SINCE EARLY NOVEMBER it does seem that there is a lot of looking and plenty of buying going on.  So maybe the front end of the NAR horse is finally doing the talking without feeling that they have to give every benefit of the doubt to fluff up the home sale numbers.  JUST BECAUSE YOU WISH YOU WERE IN KANSAS DOESN’T GET YOU THERE IMMEDIATELY.  TORNADO’S ARE RARE IN CENTRAL VIRGINIA AND I HAVE YET TO FIND A YELLOW BRICK ROAD AROUND THESE PARTS.

OPTIMISTS AND PESSIMESTS ALL, FEEL FREE TO READ THE LATEST NATIONAL SALES DATA
FOR RESALE HOMES BELOW.  THIS TIME I CHOOSE TO LOOK AT THIS DATA FROM AN OPTIMISTIC
PERSPECTIVE BECAUSE I FINALLY AM SEEING THE TINMEN, SCARECROWS, LIONS AND EVEN
THE WICKED WITCHES OUT LOOKING AND BUYING  HOMES. 

Existing-Home Sales Continue to Climb in November Washington, DC, December 21, 2011 Existing-home sales rose again in November and remain above a year ago, according to the National Association of Realtors®. Also released today were periodic benchmark revisions with downward adjustments to sales and inventory data since 2007, led by a decline in for-sale-by-owners.

Although rebenchmarking resulted in lower adjustments to several years of home sales data, the month-to-month characterization of market conditions did not change. There are no changes to home prices or month’s supply. The latest monthly data shows total existing-home sales1, which are completed transactions that include single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, increased 4.0 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.42 million in November from 4.25 million in October, and are 12.2 percent above the 3.94 million-unit pace in November 2010.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said more people are taking advantage of the buyer’s market. “Sales reached the highest mark in 10 months and are 34 percent above the cyclical low point in mid-2010 – a genuine sustained sales recovery appears to be developing,” he said. “We’ve seen healthy gains in contract activity, so it looks like more people are realizing the great opportunity that exists in today’s market for buyers with long-term plans.” According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage fell to a record low 3.99 percent in November from 4.07 percent in October; the rate was 4.30 percent in November 2010; records date back to 1971.

NAR President Moe Veissi, broker-owner of Veissi & Associates Inc., in Miami, said housing affordability conditions have set a new record high. “With record low mortgage interest rates and bargain home prices, NAR’s housing affordability index shows that a median-income family can easily afford a median-priced home,” he said. “With consumer price inflation rising by more than 3 percent this year, consumers are looking to lock-in steady payments by taking out long-term fixed-rate mortgages. However, the problem remains that some financially qualified families who are willing to stay well within their means are being denied the opportunity to buy in today’s market by the overly restrictive mortgage underwriting situation,” Veissi said.

An elevated level of contract failures continues to hold back a broader sales recovery. Contract failures2 were reported by 33 percent of NAR members in November, unchanged from October but notably above a year ago when it was 9 percent. Contract failures are cancellations caused by declined mortgage applications, failures in loan underwriting from appraised values coming in below the negotiated price, or other problems including lower conforming mortgage loan limits, home inspections and employment losses.

Also released today are benchmark revisions3 to historic existing-home sales. The 2010 benchmark shows there were 4,190,000 existing-home sales last year, a 14.6 percent revision from the previously projected 4,908,000 sales. For the total period of 2007 through 2010, sales and inventory were downwardly revised by 14.3 percent. The revisions are expected to have a minor impact on future revisions to Gross Domestic Product. “From a consumer’s perspective, only the local market information matters and there are no changes to local multiple listing service (MLS) data or local supply-and-demand balance, or to local home prices,” Yun explained. A divergence developed over time between sales reported by MLSs and sales determined by a U.S. Census benchmark; the variance began in 2007. Reasons include growth in MLS coverage areas from which sales data is collected, and geographic population shifts. “It appears that about half of the revisions result solely from a decline in for-sale-by-owners (FSBOs), with more sellers turning to Realtors® to market their homes when the market softened. The FSBO market was overwhelmed during the housing downturn, and since most FSBOs are not reported in MLSs, national estimates of existing-home sales began to diverge based on previous assumptions,” Yun said. NAR consumer survey data in 2000 showed FSBOs accounted for a 16 percent market share, which fell to a record low 9 percent in 2010. “In essence, Realtors® began to capture a greater market share. In addition to a decline in FSBO transactions, more builders began marketing new properties through real estate brokers that weren’t completely filtered from the existing-home data,” Yun said. “Some property listings on more than one MLS, and issues related to house flipping, also contributed to the downward revisions.”

The new independent benchmark was discussed with government agencies and outside housing market experts, and will allow for annual revisions in the future. Total housing inventory at the end of November fell 5.8 percent to 2.58 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 7.0-month supply4 at the current sales pace, down from a 7.7-month supply in October. “Since setting a record of 4.04 million in July 2007, inventories have trended down and supplies are moving close to price stabilization levels,” Yun said. The national median existing-home price5 for all housing types was $164,200 in November, down 3.5 percent from a year ago. Distressed homes – foreclosures and short sales typically sold at deep discounts – accounted for 29 percent of sales in November (19 percent were foreclosures and 10 percent were short sales), compared with 28 percent in October and 33 percent in November 2010.

All-cash sales accounted for 28 percent of purchases in November; they were 29 percent in October and 31 percent in November 2010. Investors make up the bulk of cash transactions. Investors purchased 19 percent of homes in November, little changed from 18 percent in October and 19 percent in November 2010. First-time buyers accounted for 35 percent of transactions in November, up from 34 percent in October and 32 percent in November 2010. Single-family home sales rose 4.5 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.95 million in November from 3.78 million in October, and are 12.9 percent above the 3.50 million-unit level in November 2010. The median existing single-family home price was $164,100 in November, down 4.0 percent from a year ago. Existing condominium and co-op sales were unchanged at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 470,000 in November and are 6.8 percent higher than the 440,000-unit pace one year ago. The median existing condo price6 was $164,600 in November, which is 0.2 percent below November 2010.

Regionally, existing-home sales in the Northeast jumped 9.8 percent to an annual pace of 560,000 in November and are 7.7 percent above a year ago. The median price in the Northeast was $240,200, which is 0.1 percent below November 2010. Existing-home sales in the Midwest rose 4.3 percent in November to a level of 960,000 and are 15.7 percent higher than November 2010. The median price in the Midwest was $133,400, down 4.0 percent from a year ago. In the South, existing-home sales increased 2.4 percent to an annual pace of 1.74 million in November and are 12.3 percent above a year ago. The median price in the South was $143,300, which is 2.1 percent below November 2010. Existing-home sales in the West rose 3.6 percent to an annual level of 1.16 million in November and are 11.5 percent higher than November 2010. The median price in the West was $195,300, down 8.4 percent below a year ago. The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing 1.1 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries. # # #

Share

Here is the November 2011 National Housing Survey Results: (My words: A slight increase in housing sales and prices may be closer than we think!)

I always get excited to see the results of the Monthly Fannie Mae Housing Survey. 

For me I guess hope springs eternal.  As an economics guy through and
through I know that economic data such as employment levels, foreclosure and
short sale levels and average hourly wages drive the markets including real
estate.  However, public opinion can start to influence real estate markets
especially on the periphery with either a positive or negative outlook affecting
whether somebody will buy a home, rent or stay where they are even if it is in
Mom and Dad’s garage at age 30.
Please take time to look at this latest survey below.  While there is
still much, “woe is me and doom and gloom” there appears to be a slight flicker
of light at the end of the tunnel.  Some of you may quickly come back at me and
say the light is attached to the oncoming train that is about to run us all
over. 
I admit I would chuckle a bit at that retort.  However the optimist in
me would say that the light from the train would also light  up a path to safety
as the train comes roaring past.  That is where I think we may be.  I think the
stinkin’ 5 year old housing eco peace and love to all tofu burning train is
roaring past and we will be back riding the old slow and steady fossil burning,
black smoke producing freight train of a housing market. 
I have always been a turtle fan myself.  The hare had his turn in the
2000′s but in this decade I ask all of you to become fans of the turtle.
Instead of fearing the turtle, endorse and embrace the turtle.  Let’s all scream
from the rooftops, “We just don’t care…. about the hare.”  And of course, say it with great flair!!!
 Slow and steady wins the race and a slow and steady housing market will allow all who
own homes to enjoy an increase in home equity and  give them a feeling of optimism.  That
will lead to a better overall macro economy and who knows perhaps the Cubs will
win the World Series!! 
I would love to hear your comments about this survey and about my
opinions.  I can take it as I am a big boy.  Although, nice comment are more
welcome than not so nice comments:)

 

Consumer Concerns Stabilize in November; Downward Slide of Consumer Sentiment Appears to Have Halted

Home Price Expectations Improve While Other Indicators Show Little Change in Trend

Pete Bakel

202-752-2034

WASHINGTON, DC – Amid a spate of positive economic news during the November survey period, consumer sentiment appears to have stabilized from previous levels, with only incremental improvement in the deeply negative housing market sentiment witnessed this summer. According to results from Fannie Mae’s November National Housing Survey, home price expectations moved from negative to positive territory for the first time in six months, with respondents expecting home prices to increase by 0.2 percent over the next year.  Overall, trends demonstrate that consumers are in a “wait and see” pattern as we move into 2012. This places consumer sentiment in line with Fannie Mae’s Economics & Mortgage Market Group’s November forecast of temporary economic improvement during the third and fourth quarters of 2011 leading into a slower economic growth path in 2012.

“Though their home price expectations have become slightly positive, consumers remain concerned about the direction of the economy and continue to view their household finances as being relatively flat,” said Doug Duncan, vice president and chief economist of Fannie Mae. “Most Americans expect no improvement in their personal financial situation in the next 12 months and will likely remain wary about undertaking the significant financial obligation associated with homeownership until their view of their income, expenses, and job security heads in a more positive direction.”

SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS

Homeownership and Renting

  • Twenty-two percent of respondents expect home prices to increase over the next year (up 3 percentage points since last month), while 22 percent say they expect home prices to decline, down 1 percentage point since last month. 53 percent say prices will stay the same, a 2 percentage point drop from October.
  • Thirty-three percent of Americans say that mortgage rates will go up over the next 12 months, down 3 percentage points from October and a return to the level seen in September.
  • Sixty-eight percent of respondents say it is a good time to buy a home (down by 1 percentage point since last month), and just 10 percent say it is a good time to sell, which is unchanged from the previous two months.
  • On average, Americans expect home rental prices to increase by 3.2 percent over the next year, a 0.1 percent decrease from October.
  • Just 6 percent expect a decline in home rental prices (unchanged since last month), while 41 percent of respondents believe that home rental prices will increase in the next 12 months.
  • Thirty-two percent of Americans say they would rent their next home, while 63 percent say they would buy, down 3 percentage points since last month and a return to the level seen in September.

The Economy and Household Finances

  • Seventy-five percent of Americans say the economy is off on the wrong track (down 2 percentage points since October), while just 16 percent think the economy is on the right track, unchanged since September and tying the all-time low number.
  • The number of respondents expecting their personal financial situation to worsen over the next 12 months has stayed at 18 percent since October.
  • Sixty-six percent say their income is about the same, the highest number ever to report this. Sixteen percent of those surveyed say their household income has increased over the past 12 months (down 2 percentage points since October) while 18 percent say that their income has declined significantly.
  • Fifty-four percent report that their expenses are about the same compared to 12 months ago (up 3 percentage points versus October). Eight percent say their household expenses have decreased over the past 12 months (down 3 percentage points since October), while 37 percent say their expenses have increased significantly.

The most detailed consumer attitudinal survey of its kind, the Fannie Mae National Housing Survey polled 1,002 Americans via live telephone interview to assess their attitudes toward owning and renting a home, mortgage rates, homeownership distress, the economy, household finances, and overall consumer confidence. Homeowners and renters are asked more than 100 questions used to track attitudinal shifts (findings are compared to the same survey conducted monthly beginning June 2010). Fannie Mae conducts this survey and shares monthly and quarterly results so that we may help industry partners and market participants target our collective efforts to stabilize the housing market in the near-term, and provide support in the future.

For detailed findings from the November 2011 survey, as well as technical notes on survey methodology and the questions asked of respondents associated with each monthly indicator, please visit the Fannie Mae Monthly National Housing Survey site.  Also available on the site are quarterly survey results, which provide a detailed assessment of combined data results from three monthly studies. The November 2011 Fannie Mae National Housing Survey was conducted between November 1, 2011 and November 25, 2011. Interviews were conducted by Penn Schoen Berland, in coordination with Fannie Mae.

Fannie Mae exists to expand affordable housing and bring global capital to local communities in order to serve the U.S. housing market. Fannie Mae has a federal charter and operates in America’s secondary mortgage market to enhance the liquidity of the mortgage market by providing funds to mortgage bankers and other lenders so that they may lend to home buyers. Our job is to help those who house America.
Share

One of Rick Stockel’s ideas on how to lessen the high and ever increasing foreclosure rate in the United States.

I am a macro economics guy and often want to throw up when I hear politicians or industry executives come out with short terms plans such as the one the California Attorney General is calling for.  She wants lenders/investors to write down as much as $100,000 in loan amounts from homeowner’s mortagage notes.  This is known as Principal Reduction!  I will look at this moral reasoning aside.

I for one stood up against the renewal of the $8000 first time home buyer tax credit in a lobbying meeting with Eric Cantor in Richmond, VA. Of course I was shouted down by the local developers and other Brokers in the room some of whom wanted it to be a $15,000 tax credit. But I was looking at the problem from a macro and long term perspective. Yes, the tax credit did have a short term stimulative effect but in the long run it just delayed and elongated the downside of the housing market cycle without addressing the real problems. I am confident that the $8000 tax credit probably cost me and you as taxpayers $20,000 plus per tax credit used.

The principal write down is a short term solution affecting only one side of the entire housing process.  Political motives are the true reason for it’s genesis.  My NUMBER ONE Universal and Economic Law is the Law of Unintended Consequences. Unless the unstated goal is to have all housing to be COMPLETELY government financed and government controlled no sane investor would invest in an asset (Mortgage Backed Securities) that could be devalued on a whim by government fiat. A rational investor, if there are any left would certainly want very high interest rates to compensate for the risk of losing value on their investment in mortgage backed securities. Hence, unless the Federal Government continuously subsidizes low mortgage interest rates as they are now doing, mortgage rates would skyrocket and residential real estate sales would plummet even more. But then the same politicians and industry leaders would simply blame the lenders and investors for charging confiscatory interest rates always looking at the rates but never looking at the risk which helps determine the rates.

My idea of getting out of this negative equity position for many homeowners is to allow banks to refinance loans without appraisals. This will not create more equity in a person’s home however it will allow them to lower their monthly payments to today’s low Federal Government subsidized rates. As rental rates continue to rise there is a tipping point where it costs less to own than to rent even if you are upside down on the value of your home. From the bank’s perspective they would lose some income (i.e. that dirty work profit) however with the Fed Funds rate at near 0% and a refinanced 30 year mortgage rate of 4.5% that is a rational profit risk vs having more and more owners just walk away from their loans.

The profit spread is higher today between the 0%-.25% Fed Funds rate and a mortgage rate of 4.5% vs the spread of a Fed Funds rate in November 2006 of 5.25% and rates of a 30 year Fixed Rate Mortgage averaging 6.34% in November 2006. Less income or  no income when somebody stops paying completely received on a mortgage loan is found on the income statement however a foreclose mortgage loan affects the balance sheet. With new stricter reserve requirements for banks one would think (as it is in their own self interest) that banks and investors would trade a little bit less income (although they would obtain a higher spread of profit today vs 2006 i.e. a higher profit margin) vs an increase of liabilities though foreclosed homes on their balance sheets.

 

Share

Tags: , ,

I have the inside scoop for $7500 Grant Funds for Home Buyers in Central Virginia with limited income.

OK!  Here is the scoop.  There is a lender in town that currently has money to give out as grants (ie FREE MONEY to YOU with some requirements).  Fall and Winter are the slow times of the year for home sales.  However, it is the BEST Time to Buy a Home for a Buyer.  Prices tend to be lower and sellers tend to be more anxious to sell because there are less buyers looking at homes.

Many lenders ran out of these grant funds several months ago.  One lender has just been given some additional funds and I can help you use that money for closing costs and/or for your downpayment.  Truly, this is the time to take advantage of this program.  There is no guarantee that these funds will be available for much longer or if at all in 2012! Additionally, it looks like interest rates will start to rise sometime in the near future.

If you or anybody you know is looking to purchase a home and earns less than $41,775/year as an individual or has less than $59,680/year for household income for a family of 4 then have them Call, Text or E-mail me immediately before these grant funds get claimed by other fortunate buyers. 

Be a Great Friend, Mom or Dad, Aunt or Uncle, Co-Worker or Neighbor and let Everybody that you know who is looking to Purchase a home know about these Grant Funds and How I can help them take advantage of this limited time program!!!

Here are the requirements for this Free Money Grant Funds Program. 

Eligible Use of Funds:
Downpayment and closing cost assistance for the
purchase of an existing home in neighborhoods targeted
for stabilization by a federal, state or local governmental
governmental agency. (Contact Rick Stockel for Qualified
Properties)
Eligible Borrowers:   First-Time or Non-First-Time Borrowers
Occupancy Type:       Primary Residence
Matching Subsidy Ratio:      4:1
Maximum Grant Amount:     $7,500*
Minimum Borrower Contribution:    $1,000
Borrower’s Income Requirement:    See Below…

Localities included in the Richmond Metro Area

Amelia; Caroline; Charles; Chesterfield; Cumberland; Dinwiddie; Goochland; Hanover; Henrico; King & Queen; King William; New Kent; Powhatan; Prince George; Sussex; Colonial Heights; Hopewell; Petersburg; Richmond City

Household Size:

1                            2                        3                           4

Maximum Income:

$41,775               $47,745           $53,710               $59,680

Household Size:

5                             6                        7                           8

Maximum Income:

$64,450               $69,230          $74,000              $78,780
*Grants funds subject to availability  **Grant is forgivable after 5 years  ***Must be used in conjunction with an FHA or USDA/RD loan

Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

September 2011 Existing Home Sales Results on a National Basis and my Opinion of What is Happening in Central Virginia

The following data is taken from the October 20, 2011 National Association of Realtors®. Press Release.

Total existing-home sales, which are completed transactions that include single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, declined 3.0 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.91 million in September from an upwardly revised 5.06 million in August, but are 11.3 percent above the 4.41 million unit pace in September 2010.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the market has been stable although at low levels, and there is plenty of room for improvement. “Existing-home sales have bounced around this year, staying relatively close to the current level in most months,” he said. “The irony is affordability conditions have improved to historic highs and more creditworthy borrowers are trying to purchase homes, but the share of contract failures is double the level of September 2010. Even so, the volume of successful buyers is higher than a year ago and is remaining fairly stable – this speaks to an unfulfilled demand.”

All-cash sales accounted for 30 percent of purchase activity in September, up from 29 percent in August and 29 percent also in September 2010; investors make up the bulk of cash purchases.

Investors purchased 19 percent of homes in September, down from 22 percent in August; they were 18 percent in September 2010. First-time buyers accounted for 32 percent of transactions in September, unchanged from August; they were also 32 percent in September 2010.

In the South, existing-home sales declined 2.6 percent to an annual level of 1.89 million in September but are 10.5 percent above a year ago. The median price in the South was $144,400, down 3.0 percent from September 2010.

 

Here is a chart I dug up from Trulia that shows the median Sales Price of Homes in the Richmond, VA area over the past 5 years.

Richmond median sales prices

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , ,

Now is THE Time to Buy Rental Properties in Central Virginia

If buying a first or second home has crossed your mind this could be the
absolute bottom of the interest rate cycle.  It is almost always impossible to
time the top and bottom of any market cycle but with mortgage rates this low you
really can’t go wrong and you face further risk on rising rates than on lowered
rates.
Additionally, if you are looking for rental properties now is the time to
start accumulating them.  With investment mortgage rates also at all-time lows
and greatly depreciated asset (home) prices there are so many potential rental
properties that have good positive cash flow for you to purchase.
From my economic perspective I see the following:  Absolute home prices at
a decade low, relative home prices at a decades low and mortgage rates at
absolute lows since rates were quantified on a national basis. Home sales are
down significantly since the mid 2000′s. Humans have 3 options in seeking
shelter.  They can live on the streets (not the most desirable choice), they can
own homes or they can rent.  This is a zero sum game in that the number of folks
living on the street is relatively stable minutely +- in all economic
condition.  So the proportion that changes most is between owning and renting.
At this time the rate of home ownership has lessened so more people are
renting.
In areas that don’t have rent control this means that rental prices have
followed the normal law of supply and demand.  Currently there is less demand
for owning homes but a much greater demand for renting homes.  Since there is a
greater demand for renting homes the rental rates have risen over the past 2
years.  This makes owning rental homes very advantageous as an investment in
that it has become the one area to invest in that has positive cash flow with
rates of annual return from 4% to 10% and higher.  That sure beats most all
other investments.
Now to go just a bit further down the time-lime.  The Fed is keeping short
and long term interest rates artificially low at this point.  Perhaps current
mortgage rates would be near 5% without the intervention of the Fed. At some
point within the next year or so the Fed will start allowing all interest rates
including mortgage rates to rise to their natural levels.  Those investors or homebuyers
with long term time horizons will have lost their ability to take
advantage of the artificially low rates.
But as interest rates rise I foresee a rise in inflation.  Guess what, as inflation increases the prices of most daily
goods and services increase but also the prices of assets increase.  A home is
an asset.  So for investors who buy rental homes now and lock in on low prices
and low mortgage rates they will have set themselves up for an enjoyable life as
we enter into a more inflationary period.  Buying Rental Properties now in this
period of the interest rate cycle and housing market cycle makes sense to those
looking for a long term investment that provides a significant rate of return
and an increase in asset value.
Call or text me at 804-218-3143 with any  questions comments or if you want to have me start looking for rental homes for
you.
Rick
Stockel
Share

Tags: , , , ,

What does rising inflation mean for mortgage rates? What led to the extremely low rates we are seeing now?

Ok!! It is obvious that most market areas in the US are in their 5th+ year of
a housing slump. My opinion is that undue political pressure was put on lenders
to make loans in the name of “fairness” to folks who had significantly lower than average
credit scores and minimal or no money for the downpayment and closing costs.
Lenders, Realtors, Investors and the Buyers and Sellers themselves all did what
rational people do and that is look out for their own self-interest. That is
rational on an individual basis but leads to huge market distortions in an
aggregate basis because it is impossible over time for any product’s price to
increase at much greater rates than the average individual’s income. Creative
loans such as 100% financing, no doc or low doc loans, 80-10-10 loans, etc were
developed to allow folks to qualify for more and more expensive homes.

This created an oversupply of buyers (increased demand) with originally a
lower number of homes for sale leading to a classic case of overdemand and
undersupply. Prices rose geometrically and outstripped raises in wages. At the
end of the cycle builders had ramped up production and the number of buyers
decreased. At some point the housing market was going to crash as supply and
demand attempted to come back into equilibrium. It then swung to an oversupply
situation with too many builder spec homes and an increasing number of
foreclosure and short sale homes. We went past that equilibrium point and have
had to deal with the downside of the market cycle for a while….and Boy did the
housing market Crash throughout much of the US as evidenced by the last 5 years
of lowered housing prices.

Partly as a response to the US housing slump the overall economy fell to
lower levels as well. The Fed started to lower interest rates through various
means to spur investment and entice borrowers to borrow at the lower interest
rates. In theory this sounds good and makes good political fodder and gives some
great talking points to our leaders. (I am a firm believer in rational thought
and believe that most folks work in their own self-interest) But many buyers
stayed on the sideline and did not move to a larger home or move out of their
apartment or parents’ home because they were fearful of losing their jobs or of
home prices falling even lower. So did the lower interest rates help rally the
housing market? It certainly didn’t hurt and those who purchased homes in the
past 2 years for the long term will have done quite well for themselves.  But
overall it was not the panacea to increasing the rate of home sales.  But the
threat of rising Inflation and the fear of missing the bottom of the interest
rate cycle may be the motivating factors that leads to rising housing sales and
prices.

As the Fed lowered rates such as the Fed Funds rate and injected more money
(liquidity) into the markets through various means we basically devalued the
dollar. At some point (I think we are close to that point) real inflation starts
to heat up and prices rise. Look at the prices of foodstuffs and clothing. They
are rising. Computers and Housing prices have fallen however they are not items
you buy every day or even every year. While many different types of products are
including in determining the inflation rate, for most Americans the products we
buy every week are the true test of the inflation rate. The prices of products
we buy weekly are increasing.

Last week the Core CPI (consumer price index) numbers for August were
released. Prices were up 2% over last years numbers. The August Core PPI
(producer price index) numbers for August were up 2.5% from 2010′s numbers.

Inflation is here and is coming at us fast. Typically interest rates rise in
conjunction with rising inflation rates. The simple explanation for this is that
investors can primarily do 5 things with their money. They can hide it under
their bed, they can invest in real estate, they can buy commodities such as
gold, silver etc, they can buy equities (ie stocks) or they can buy bonds.
Investors who buy bonds tend to be conservative investors and they like a
guaranteed return even if it is much lower than most other investments because
they value the security of their investment as a positive trade-off.

However, if the nasty inflation bug starts to bite, investors will demand
higher interest rates to balance the loss of value of their bonds due to
inflation. This is a simple explanation but a very valid one. Know that with
rising inflation comes rising interest rates in most every case.

At some point in the inflation cycle commodities and all assets will start to
increase in price in conjunction with the rising inflation rates. Right now the
Fed is purposefully keeping short and long term interest rates artificially low.
This will end soon and my best estimate is that it will end sometime by late
2012. Perhaps right after the 2012 elections when it is politically expedient to
do so.

This means that once the fed takes its foot off the neck of interest rates
and allows them to float freely interest rates will go up and in conjunction
with rising inflation interest rates could potentially go up quite a bit. I see
30 year mortgage rate hitting close to 6% by early 2013. Considering that they
are currently in the low 4% range that will be a dramatic increase.

My take on the current housing situation is that every person who is
considering investing in real estate should purchase your homes now or at the
latest prior to the end of 2012. Lock in on depreciated housing prices and on
the artificially low mortgage rates. Rental Rates have been and will continue
to increase with rising inflation.  That makes investing in real estate a good
investment with many homes currently showing significant positive cash flow.

For folks looking to buy a personal home or a 2nd home and have a 4 to 10+
year horizon of ownership then now is the time to buy for the same reasons as I
stated for investors. Lock in on low lousing prices and historically low
interest rates.

If you have a 3 year or less time horizon of owning a particular home I think
that renting makes. Do know that if and when you are ready to buy a home in the
future that rates and prices will be higher if I am correct with my analysis of
the coming of higher inflation and interest rates. The lack of a significant
increase in housing prices over the next 2 or 3 years (inflation will start to
be problematic by late 2012 or early 2013) and the expenses of selling your home
without getting the full effect of the rise in housing prices due to rising
inflation rates make renting for short term periods the best economic
decision.

I believe housing prices are bouncing along at their lowest levels and will
start increasing when inflation starts to hit the economy harder. I certainly
see inflation becoming an issue by 2013 and see prices of all goods and assets
increasing at that point going forward. So if you are looking to buy a home with
a long term mentality you are best to do it over the next year.

 

Rick
Stockel
Neumann & Dunn Real Estate and Development,
LLC
Realtor/Partner
2044 John Rolfe Parkway
Richmond, VA
23238
Direct: (804) 218-3143
Fax: (804) 750-1836

One of Central Virginia’s Top
Realtors

Consistently among the top 1% in Sales Volume in Central
Virginia.
www.RickStockel.com

 

Share

Tags: , , ,

Real Estate Marbles Network